Comments (5)
@ronaldtse, question please:
Is it necessary that the format of the restructured appendix match exactly with the original one?
For example, by comparing the first resolution (and obviating the rendering errors, metanorma/metanorma-standoc#346),
Original:
Restructured (using a yaml2text block):
There are some differences in the layout. Do they matter? Is it necessary to include the missing note? What happens with the resolutions that are in the yaml files but not in the original?
(In the case above, I could remove the first "considering " word from the paragraphs if you prefer.)
from bipm-si-brochure.
There are some differences in the layout. Do they matter?
Yes.
Is it necessary to include the missing note?
Yes.
What happens with the resolutions that are in the yaml files but not in the original?
Ignore them.
from bipm-si-brochure.
Besides from the fact that there are some additional resolutions in YAML (which are not included in Word), some of them are also missing. For example, there is no YAML file for CIPM 2001. YAML file for CIPM 2002 doesn't contain the content of Recommendation 1.
I recall some of the resolutions were missing in HTML (broken URLs). Probably this is the reason why they are also missing in YAML files.
Should we add the missing content based on what we have in Word and PDF versions of BIPM brochure?
from bipm-si-brochure.
Should we add the missing content based on what we have in Word and PDF versions of BIPM brochure?
@anermina Yes please!
I'm not sure what we should do with the Notes though, because they don't really belong to the resolution... maybe there could be an additional key for "additional notes added at {date}"?
from bipm-si-brochure.
@ronaldtse I added missing resolutions and recommendations, or missing parts of them. Notes aren't added yet.
Most of the notes are written in the following format:
For the latter case, we don't have the information about the date. Maybe we could add separate keywords, i.e. one for the note and the other for the year when the change was made?
At first I thought it would be the best to have these non-asterisk notes as footnotes, but it doesn't seem like a good solution in all cases:
And another thing... What we currently don't have in YAML files is yellow highlighted in the first image - reference written in small brackets, asterisk and the corresponding note.
That is actually this part of HTML version of the same resolution:
...which brings up the question about references.
We included references in the form of corresponding URLs in YAML files. Value of the key reference:
cannot be used as such in order to produce (CR, 34 - 38)
in this specific case. Do we need to create another keyword for this short name, in order to be able to reproduce the file correctly using yaml2text?
from bipm-si-brochure.
Related Issues (20)
- Indentation of table title HOT 7
- BIPM: Initials vs. list items issue HOT 2
- Unable to install dependencies HOT 1
- Site generate for collection generates component PDFs twice HOT 3
- Fix build HOT 6
- Update SI Brochure references to outcomes HOT 2
- Encoding indented editorial note HOT 3
- (URGENT) UnitsML encoding missing from resulting Semantic XML HOT 2
- Site generate fails HOT 1
- BIPM requested fixes 1: "the number 9 192 631 770" HOT 1
- BIPM requested fixes 2: small spaces between closing parenthesis and unit symbols disappeared HOT 15
- BIPM requested fixes 3: bibliography problem with the processing of Declarations HOT 2
- BIPM requested fixes 4: form of the references for the meetings needs a minor adjustment in the French bibliography HOT 15
- BIPM requested fixes 5: references to Metrologia HOT 2
- BIPM requested fixes 6: problem with the reference to the CIPM Declaration 1971-00 HOT 1
- BIPM requested fixes 7: bibliography items authorship rendering inconsistency HOT 4
- BIPM requested fixes 8: French version links to meetings in Resolutions should be to the French version HOT 2
- BIPM requested fixes 9: Is there a reason why the links to Metrologia in the Bibliography have not been made active? HOT 18
- BIPM requested fixes 10: "Milton J" should be "Milton M" HOT 13
- Incorrect SI Brochure docnumber HOT 6
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from bipm-si-brochure.