Question: how stable is it to round-trip code? about bytecode HOT 3 CLOSED

This is a perfectly legitimate use case of bytecode and any issue your encounter doing this would be a bug.

@thautwarm if I remember correctly you use bytecode to modify constants and probably do a lot of round tripping as a consequence, can you comment on this too.

from bytecode.

@MatthieuDartiailh Yes, I did a lot of this sort of stuffs..

I don't see any corner case that would break, if any it must be a bug and should be solved.

@fabioz For your use case, there might be something to be take care.

1. If you're using Python < 3.6, be cautious about lineno of an Instr.

   Python 3.6 begins to support negative line number delta, so in 3.5 or lower versions, when inserting new instructions, you should guarantee that the linenos are monotonically increasing along instructions.

2. Besides, I recommend you to generate new instructions via a generator, instead of performing multiple insertions(it is inefficient if you insert for multiple times).

   def gen(instrs):
      yield from (instrs[i] for i in range(1, i)
      yield instrs[i]
      yield Instr("LOAD_GLOBAL", '_pydev_stop_at_break')
      yield Instr("LOAD_CONST", stop_at_line)
      yield Instr("CALL_FUNCTION", 1)
      yield Instr("POP_TOP")
      yield from (instrs[i] for i in range(i, len(instrs))

3. A global name _pydev_stop_at_break might be rare enough and users will not write down such a name, but still, it is not well encapsulated or hidden well from users.

   If the bytecode modified by debugger will not be dumped into .pyc file, you might consider insert a constant function instead of loading it from globals(loading from globals also requires you to initialize the variable in each module).

    Instr("LOAD_GLOBAL", '_pydev_stop_at_break')

   ->

     def pydev_stop_at_break(...):
        ...
     Instr("LOAD_CONST", pydev_stop_at_break)

   I used to have this demand so I asked for this feature, thanks to @MatthieuDartiailh for kindly reviewing and accepting this.

from bytecode.

Thank you for the feedback.

@thautwarm I'm actually using that only with Python 3.5 onwards and I'm converting the list to a double linked list (so that multiple insertions are efficient and to have a nicer API as iterating/changing items at the same time is a bit more straightforward), so, 1 and 2 are already ok, and thanks for the tip on the LOAD_CONST, I'll take a look into using that.

from bytecode.