Rename? about org-mode-hs HOT 8 CLOSED

Split into multiple libraries ?

from org-mode-hs.

Split into multiple libraries ?

This makes sense, although it would be nice to have a common prefix to the libraries, and just org feels a bit pretentious. Maybe the org-parser prefix is fine, and I would do this:

• org-parser -> parser
• org-parser-cli -> provides a org-hs executable
• org-parser-exporters -> common exporter functionality
• org-parser-html
• org-parser-pandoc
• ...

from org-mode-hs.

What do the last two mean?

Also, what does org-parser-cli provide?

I'm trying to understand the various 'components' of this project.

from org-mode-hs.

The org-parser-exporters library would basically include the Org.Exporters.Common file, that exports the ExportBackend class. Other libraries can create export backends by instantiating this class.

The name is awkward but org-parser-html and org-parser-pandoc basically just do this, I wrote the last two like that because org-parser-exporter-html and org-parser-exporter-pandoc are too awkward... lol

from org-mode-hs.

• horg -> cli exectuable
• horg-parser -> the parser and AST
• horg-exporter -> exporter core, along with default exporters (html and pandoc)
  • can further be split into horg-exporter, horg-exporter-html and horg-exporter-pandoc if really must

from org-mode-hs.

This division makes sense, but isn't org-hs better than horg?

from org-mode-hs.

I'm not even a fan of horg; I'd come up with a really unique and memorable name, like Orgile.

from org-mode-hs.

I think I'll do this: since it's available, the common prefix will be just org (so org-parser, org-cli, org-exporters). If people complain, yaorg. For some reason the other names sound to me like they're either about an app or some sort of new markup language, different from emacs' org.

Also, this library seems closer org-element than the other available Haskell parsers.

Edit: perhaps the CLI tool can have a nicer name, since it's more like an "app".

from org-mode-hs.