How to prioritize wired links？ about lime-packages HOT 7 OPEN

Hi @ggsnpdsn !
How do you see that you "always access the internet through the path directly connected to the first node"?
I don't know if there is a smart way to have the routing protocols using the cable over the wifi. I hope they will do it when they see that the packets loss on the wifi is higher than the one on the cable...

from lime-packages.

Due to the poor performance of 802.11r testing, I want to use this solution as an alternative

from lime-packages.

Try removing this line:

from lime-packages.

@ggsnpdsn please let us know if the suggestion helps!
In the positive case, I think that we can replace that line with an option that allows the user to have it or not, but leaving it off by default.
I think that we have that line for cases in which the "ground routing" (see what it is on #443) is used, but I never heard anybody saying that they are using it.

from lime-packages.

The effect is not obvious, and the data flow will be interrupted. Sometimes it is interrupted for 2s, sometimes it is interrupted for 10s, and sometimes it may be 20s. The interruption time is not a fixed value, it is a random time

from lime-packages.

? Is this the effect of removing that line??

Another thing that you can try is to use BATMAN_V instead of BATMAN_IV, see #1014

from lime-packages.

? Is this the effect of removing that line??
YES
Another thing that you can try is to use BATMAN_V instead of BATMAN_IV, see #1014

BATMAN_V performance is worse, the problem still exists, and the forwarding rate is more unstable

from lime-packages.