Will you be interested in my in-depth comparisons between mobx & redux? about js-framework-benchmark HOT 3 CLOSED

What's your conclusion? Seems like neither inferno nor react benefit from mobX/redux for this benchmark.

from js-framework-benchmark.

You are right. mobX/redux are actually extra layer on top of inferno and react so they won't do any good for the benchmarks. But they are the libraries people will use along with inferno/redux. This is more to see which flux implementation is more efficient under this benchmark.

The result for mobX vs redux is different when they are used under inferno and react. I've attached it with this comment.

When used under react, mobX is slightly faster than redux (with immutable + pure-render-mixin case) in the following cases:

• partial update
• select row
• swap rows
• remove rows
• append rows to large table

When it comes to inferno, mobX seems to be slightly slower than redux (with immutable + pure-render-mixin case).

from js-framework-benchmark.

Thought about it for a while ;-) and decided to add redux + immutable.js + pure render mixin version to the list of benchmarks, since redux is quite popular, and this version is the fastest redux version and it's interesting to see that immutable.js doesn't cost much. Results are here.

from js-framework-benchmark.