Clusterization capabilities about bulk HOT 2 CLOSED

The goal for bulk is to remain a lightweight tool that just takes care of the "bulk annotation" bit. If you want to cluster the data yourself upfront and use those clusters as colors then you can totally already do that. Just as long as the resulting .csv file has and x and y column. One challenge with this approach is that bulk will only ever allow two dimensions to be drawn, so you'll also need to think about dimensionality reduction.

In my experience clustering is a very hard problem to get right because it's very hard to "know" if you've done clustering well. There's not a metric like "accuracy" that you can use in hindsight to help you compare approaches.

Instead, I prefer to just lower the dimensionality of an embedded dataset to eye-ball if clusters appear. If they do, and I can confirm by inspecting, then I attach a label. From here it's a classification problem, which allows me to circumvent the need for clustering.

from bulk.

Feel free to tell me if I misinterpreted the request, but as-is I don't think this library needs to concern itself with clustering. That's something you're free to do upfront in a notebook as you prepare a csv file for this tool.

from bulk.