AugMix image augmentation about keras-cv HOT 11 CLOSED

Yeah, turns out the implementation is rather trivial when implemented on its own. This shouldn't be a problem.
However, instead of adding it to the utils, I have added it as a static function inside the layer (see PR #407) similar to Beta sampling in MixUp and FourierMix.

from keras-cv.

What is Applies Confidence Adjusted Mixup (CAMixup) regularization!

Is CONFIDENCE ADJUSTED MIXUP ENSEMBLES in:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09875

from keras-cv.

cc. @AakashKumarNain
Ref.

from keras-cv.

google/automl#362

google/uncertainty-baselines@274772f

from keras-cv.

What is Applies Confidence Adjusted Mixup (CAMixup) regularization!

from keras-cv.

Thanks for opening this. I'll be including this soon from tf similarity

from keras-cv.

I was looking to implement this but there seems to be no implementation of Dirichlet outside tensorflow_probability (which I assume can't be used). The only other option seems to be the implementation of the distribution as part of utils (which seems unnecessarily tedious).

I would love any suggestions here!

from keras-cv.

There is also in Tensorflow but It is a v1 symbol (TF 1.x/compat) so we cannot use It:

https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/python/ops/distributions/dirichlet.py#L44

I suppose that it was not maintained as an API in TF2 cause these kind of things are handled in TFP.

from keras-cv.

We can't use tfp here though, right?

from keras-cv.

I was looking to implement this but there seems to be no implementation of Dirichlet outside tensorflow_probability (which I assume can't be used). The only other option seems to be the implementation of the distribution as part of utils (which seems unnecessarily tedious).

I would love any suggestions here!

Good question. I have not given the interaction with TFP any thought. My instinct is if the only extra offering we get by adding it is Augmix that it may not be worth adding it as a dep.

from keras-cv.

@quantumalaviya

The only other option seems to be the implementation of the distribution as part of utils (which seems unnecessarily tedious).

If using tfp is not an option, I think it may be needed to add this distribution as part of utils (sounds unpleasant, agree).
Because who knows, we may need it for other cases, LIKE.

from keras-cv.