Quadratically shifted bases about classicalorthogonalpolynomials.jl HOT 4 CLOSED

Are mappings really the right way to do this? It might be better to think of these as SymmetricLegendre living in SymmetricOrthogonalPolynomials.jl as then the symmetry aspect is explicit....

from classicalorthogonalpolynomials.jl.

Do you mean "the right way to do this" in terms of package placement or in terms of the underlying implementation? Implementation wise I think it's a pretty solid way of doing it. I'm open to better ideas if that is what you meant.

Basically I'm trying to update and open source our higher dimensional equilibrium measures stuff in something like EquilibriumMeasures.jl but I need these bases working before I can do that. Making this depend on a for now private repo would complicate things, although I do agree that it would make sense for these radially symmetric bases to live in SymmetricOrthogonalPolynomials.jl eventually.

So if that is the plan, then for now I can just have the required bases explicitly coded into EquilibriumMeasures.jl until SymmetricOrthogonalPolynomials.jl is more mature and then move it there?

from classicalorthogonalpolynomials.jl.

Yes I think that's sensible... I think it would be a mistake to widen the scope of this package TBH

from classicalorthogonalpolynomials.jl.

Great, I'll start work on including it in EquilibriumMeasures.jl for now and will open an issue in SymmetricOrthogonalPolynomials.jl to remind myself to add it there when we know more about how that package will be organized.

from classicalorthogonalpolynomials.jl.