CHAT folder missing about csharpprolog HOT 9 CLOSED

No problem. My notes on the pull request itself will probably be better to help you understand than the commits. The reason is that in one commit I might have done something that worked, but then found a better way and committed that later. We can continue that conversation on the pull request itself. :)

from csharpprolog.

I see now I can add an issue to my own fork if I enable it. However, since you ported it from JohnPool's original repo I'm wondering if anything was intentionally left off and if I should even bother trying to dig it up. Thoughts? Thanks in advance.

from csharpprolog.

Thank you for your reporting!

I'm sorry to late because I was very busy for another some projects.

Anyway, I'll figure out this issue.

from csharpprolog.

I researched about this issue on internet for a few hours.

The result of researching is this:

Fact

• "CHAT-80" is a software that is copyrighted by Fernando Pereira.
• "CHAT-80" is not a part of CSharpProlog. CSharpProlog is not licensed to redistribute "CHAT-80".
• "chat" predefined predicate of CSharpProlog is provided for just a shortcut to launching "CHAT-80", for convenience to users.
• Getting "CHAT-80" program files, and storing it into "chat-80" subfolder, are responsible of individual users.
• But, today, original "CHAT-80" program files were gone due to the distribution point web site (http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~pereira/oldies.html) was closed.
• I found a part of "CHAT-80" program files in internet archives. But it is not full set, so we can't try "chat" predicate.

Conclusion

I will remove "chat" predicate from predefined predicates, and release new version of CSharpProlog.

from csharpprolog.

P.S.

I found "SAMPLES, TESTING & EXPERIMENTAL" section in predefined predicates.
That section include like these noisy predicates... :O !

age( peter, 7).
age( ann, 5).
age( ann, 6).
age( pat, 8).
age( tom, 5).

I think that these predicates are not suitable for predefined predicates.

Therefore, I'll remove all of the "SAMPLES, TESTING & EXPERIMENTAL" section from predefined predicates.

from csharpprolog.

I think that's a great idea. I'm going to submit a pull request for what I've been doing. If nothing else I'd like your comments on it. Nothing major (added a dotnetcore console app that works in linux, updated help text, etc). I THINK it will merge okay with the changes you are suggesting. I just don't want our forks to diverge too far.

from csharpprolog.

Thank you for your contributions! 👍
I found your pull request on this GitHub repository.

I'll merge your pull request after I understand what did you do.

Unfortunately, I have a task that higher priority just now, so please give me one or few days to merge your pull request.

from csharpprolog.

P.S. I'm started using GitHub project feature.

See: https://github.com/jsakamoto/CSharpProlog/projects/1

from csharpprolog.

I did it at 5f00b5e

from csharpprolog.