Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (5)

jkbrzt avatar jkbrzt commented on May 26, 2024

Similar: #32
Related: #38

from rrule.

lyschoening avatar lyschoening commented on May 26, 2024

I am just going to bring up a workaround here as it looks this may be a more complex issue. You can work in the UTC timezone and convert your result back to NZST. Using Moment.js that would be:

new RRule({
    freq: RRule.DAILY,
    dtstart: moment(new Date(2014, 8, 26, 10, 30)).tz("UTC").toDate(),
    count: 4
}).all()
    .map(function (dt) {
        return moment(dt).tz("NZST").toDate()
    })
    .map(function (dt) {
        return dt.toISOString()
    });

[
    "2014-09-25T22:30:00.000Z",
    "2014-09-26T22:30:00.000Z",
    "2014-09-27T21:30:00.000Z",
    "2014-09-28T21:30:00.000Z"
]

from rrule.

tristanm avatar tristanm commented on May 26, 2024

Thanks for the workaround suggestion, @lyschoening. Unfortunately, it has no effect becase moment(new Date(2014, 8, 26, 10, 30)).tz("UTC").toDate() is identical to new Date(2014, 8, 26, 10, 30).

I've isolated the problem to dateutil.fromOrdinal(). This function adjusts the resulting date by adding the offset. However, when crossing a DST boundary the offset becomes incorrect. For example:

For ordinal day 16341 (2014-09-28), the correct result should be Sun Sep 28 2014 00:00:00 GMT+1200 (NZST). However, new Date(millisecsFromBase + dateutil.tzOffset(new Date(millisecsFromBase))) returns Sun Sep 28 2014 13:00:00 GMT+1300 (NZDT) which is after DST kicks in at 02:00. The offset, 13 hours, is then applied but, because it crosses the DST boundary, it actually returns Sat Sep 27 2014 23:00:00 GMT+1200 (NZST) which, although technically correct, is effectively the wrong date for the purposes of this function.

I'm writing a patch for fromOrdinal() which will take into account the difference in offsets when crossing a DST boundary. I'll generate a pull request when I've done a bit of testing.

from rrule.

tristanm avatar tristanm commented on May 26, 2024

As a side note, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like part of the equation in dateutil.fromOrdinal() is redundant:

...dateutil.ORDINAL_BASE.getTime() - dateutil.tzOffset(dateutil.ORDINAL_BASE)...

This will always return zero so there's no need to calculate it.

from rrule.

davidgoli avatar davidgoli commented on May 26, 2024

I believe this may be fixed. Please reopen if you are still experiencing issues.

from rrule.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.