Won't pip install about pybib HOT 13 CLOSED

Hey Louis! Thanks for the issue, it's actually something I fixed a little while ago but I forgot to upload another version to PyPi with the fix.

The issue stems from the fact that the setup.py script in the build currently on PyPi expects two scrips, bib and pybib to exist in the bin/ folder, which is how it worked before I consolidated the functionality into bib.

I've submitted a new version to PyPi (1.2.1) - attempting to install this version works on my machine with pip3 install --user pybib (the command it installs is bib).

Could you let me know if this worked for you?

from pybib.

Hmmm, installed OK and thought it was sorted but there's still no bib command...

Don't know if this is proper usage but I tried making a dummy file with 1 line, 10.3389/fcell.2014.00040, mydoi.txt in ~/Desktop, ran find / -type d -name pybib and tried bib in there to the same effect. Straight up ~/.local/lib/python3.4/site-packages/pybib $ python3 pybib.py ~/Desktop/mydoi.txt also came back empty.

I get the same in a Biolinux virtual machine (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS)

from pybib.

bib on my system is located in ~/.local/bin, does that exist for you?

from pybib.

Ahh there it is, yeah - not automatically exported to shell after installation though. Oddly exporting to PATH in .bashrc doesn't create the shell command either, have you got an alias set up?

from pybib.

Could you please try the following:

Add the path to your .bashrc again:

# in .bashrc
export PATH="${PATH}:~/.local/bin"

Source it (or restart the terminal):

source ~/.bashrc

Then try bib again, and if it doesn't work then paste the output of echo $PATH?

from pybib.

Ohhh.. 😅 yeah that works.. I must have mucked up the path line, I do apologise!

~ $ bib
usage: bib [-h] [-o OUT] [-v] [-f [FILE]] [DOI]
bib: error: one of the arguments DOI -f/--file is required

from pybib.

Brilliant 😄

from pybib.

I'll put something in the README to make sure people have the local pip binary path in their path.

from pybib.

Sounds like a plan. Also I was going to mention that you might want to peruse Carl Boettiger's knitcitations R package, I've been using it with Rmarkdown docs and it's pretty nice. It uses the CrossRef API (starting here), I guess it'd be easier to port something else rather than write from scratch

from pybib.

Looks nice! I made this just for personal usage when writing things for Uni really. Primarily I use it to grab individual citations for new papers and add them to an existing .bib file, like so:

bib 10.3389/fcell.2014.00040 >> existing_citations.bib

# (piped through bibtool - another program which formats the entry and auto-generates a citation key:
bib 10.3389/fcell.2014.00040 | bibtool >> existing_citations.bib

And that's pretty much the extend of my usage.

from pybib.

I like it, Carl's package lets you get a bit more elaborate with in-text citations that address the bibliography through those unique referents like @Weiser_1993, which are handled such that you get the same effect as Word's cross-referencing of numbered citations in the (knitr/pandoc-generated) pdf.

I dropped you a tweet anyway, sure a lot of folks would find this useful :-)

from pybib.

That sounds really handy, I can see how it would be useful. I personally prefer doing it this way just because it ensures that I don't need any specific tool to build my document if I lose the code to this way down the line, but it does mean you need the extra step!

Thanks for the tweet 😄

from pybib.

Another reason I'm not wholly behind the approach is that it contributes to a pretty gruesome scaling of time-to-compile-to-pdf with number of citations, and don't mention it 🐥

from pybib.