What's the status and direction of the project? about pgjdbc-ng HOT 17 OPEN

Not abandoned but we have migrated all of our usage away from JDBC and therefore my main maintenance motivation has gone away.

I will try to get things updated in the coming week.

from pgjdbc-ng.

Thanks for the answer. What are you using now? Vertx?

from pgjdbc-ng.

Perhaps you would consider re-licensing this project under the Postgres license, which would allow others to more easily continue the (very nice) work you have started?

from pgjdbc-ng.

@xzilla I'm definitely open. It's currently the 3 clause BSD so I'm not sure how that's limiting anything. That being said, I've wanted to move it of this defunct organization for a while now.

from pgjdbc-ng.

@raphw We've moved entirely to Quarkus. So yes we're using the reactive PG driver from the Vert.x platform (which Quarkus is built upon).

from pgjdbc-ng.

@kdubb I have no issue moving it into org.postgresql. and housing it inside our github repo if that's something that appeals to you.

from pgjdbc-ng.

@davecramer That would be a great move. I'll chat with you in the next week or so to get things going. I've got a lot going currently.

from pgjdbc-ng.

FYI, I'm happy to continue maintaining the project as much as I can. It has involved a large amount of effort to start and continue the project from myself and others. I don't want to walk away but as I said I've got lots of time constraints.

Also, the pluggable type engine this driver is built on to support advanced, composite, and custom types might live on; either as an add-on or integrated with the Vert.x driver. Currently the Vert.x driver has little to no support for them.

from pgjdbc-ng.

@davecramer We have talked about this in the past - at least in person 😃 The question is who will maintain the code in the new repository if @kdubb doesn't have time for it. I'm only working with C and Rust now, so I don't have time to do bigger contributions.

I'm happy to sign over my contributions to a new license if necessary.

from pgjdbc-ng.

@jesperpedersen well that's an excellent question. One possibility is that inside the PostgreSQL org it might get more love. I don't have an answer.

from pgjdbc-ng.

Regardless of maintenance capacity, moving the copyright to a proper organization and possibly relicensing is something that should be done; the obvious first choice would be the PostgreSQL org.

from pgjdbc-ng.

@davecramer The new package name could reflect it in some way. The pluggable type engine is the key part -- ideally it should be ported over

from pgjdbc-ng.

PostgreSQL Org + 3-BSD works for me

from pgjdbc-ng.

@raphw Used a bit less pessimistic title. You spurred on a good conversation that we needed to start. 😉

from pgjdbc-ng.

Of course, thanks for taking up the question so quickly and actively!

from pgjdbc-ng.

Update... If there's a path forward that doesn't include me being the ongoing sole maintainer, I'd be willing to commit to on a new release with some updates, a more appropriate package and a transferred copyright that we can finally move to the PostgreSQL org.

from pgjdbc-ng.

I've created issue #587 to track the transfer to the PostgreSQL organization.

from pgjdbc-ng.