Comments from Jürgen Schönwälder about architecture HOT 3 CLOSED

I disagree with removing Root-of-Trust and replacing with TFW, but open to the discussion. TFW is not a commonly used term and RoT is more common in the industry. Perhaps we need to clean up to use the common term.

from architecture.

Actually I am thinking that we need to remove TFW from the terminology section and not use it in the document except as an example (like we did with security domain). Unlike the old OTrP which baked in the concept of TFW in the protocol in ways that caused problems for SGX, the TEEP protocol has no such problems and TFW is no different from any other trusted dependency (e.g., OP-TEE, or a launch enclave, or microcode or whatever else).

from architecture.

Also the SUIT WG decided to not use the term RoT in the doc. Is there a reason we need it that would not apply to SUIT?

from architecture.