File unexpectedly passes validation - should complain about arrays in response or undefined type about openapi-validator HOT 6 CLOSED

Hmm yeah that's an interesting one. Neither would be tough to add and I agree that this should probably be flagged somehow. I'm inclined to lean towards treating the schema as an array due to the presence of the items property, rather than flagging the missing type, but I'm not sure.

@mkistler what do you think?

from openapi-validator.

I won't advocate this as a general rule, but in this particular case, I think we should treat a schema with items as being an array.

from openapi-validator.

Thanks 👍 - can confirm this is working great in v0.13.5 https://github.com/IBM/openapi-validator/releases/tag/v0.13.5

from openapi-validator.

@jamescooke If you agree with that, I can implement that fix this week

from openapi-validator.

@dpopp07 @mkistler Thanks for reviewing this issue. I'm happy with treating this as an array and giving the "Arrays MUST NOT be returned as the top-level structure in a response body." error 👍

from openapi-validator.

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.13.4 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

from openapi-validator.