Incorrect Conversion of Overlapping Highlights or Notes Upon Page Navigation about client HOT 5 OPEN

That's not a standard build of the Hypothesis client shown in the video, which also probably means it is not based on a current version. The controls in the standard build look like this:

Can you confirm the version number that is shown in the sidebar (it's under the "?" button), the URL of the page that is being annotated (if there is one) or the software in which Hypothesis is being used?

from client.

That's not a standard build of the Hypothesis client shown in the video, which also probably means it is not based on a current version. The controls in the standard build look like this:

Can you confirm the version number that is shown in the sidebar (it's under the "?" button), the URL of the page that is being annotated (if there is one) or the software in which Hypothesis is being used?

We have made some changes on the CSS part so it's looking bit different than the standard version and I was able to replicate this issue in latest version of the hypothesis-client. Please find the below video for reference
https://github.com/hypothesis/client/assets/159520431/2a50c3dc-e34e-4943-8c5e-36ad58fc040c

from client.

In that video I see two highlights created and saved and two notes created, but not saved. After the navigation away from the page and back to it, only the saved highlights persist. Changing groups in the sidebar would also lead to the same result as a navigation.

If the issue here is the confusion that the draft notes are not automatically saved, or that there isn't a warning about it, then that's understandable and I would recommend to create a specific issue about it.

from client.

In that video I see two highlights created and saved and two notes created, but not saved. After the navigation away from the page and back to it, only the saved highlights persist. Changing groups in the sidebar would also lead to the same result as a navigation.

If the issue here is the confusion that the draft notes are not automatically saved, or that there isn't a warning about it, then that's understandable and I would recommend to create a specific issue about it.

If you watch the video below, you'll notice that before navigation, highlighted text and notes appear in different colors: highlights are light yellow, while notes are a darker shade. However, when switching between pages, both words become the darker shade of yellow. Additionally, clicking on a noted word in the sidebar should only highlight the single word that we initially highlighted, but it highlights both words instead.

from client.

highlighted text and notes appear in different colors: highlights are light yellow

Highlights and annotations don't actually have different colors, but we do show a "darker" color when there are "stacked" annotations, or more than one annotation in the same block of text, in order to more visually spotlight what parts are heavily annotated.

In fact, it's not really darker, technically speaking. What really happens is that the element we use for highlights and annotations has a yellow color with opacity. As an intentional side effect, the opacity makes it look darker the more annotations are rendered in the same piece of text.

However, when switching between pages, both words become the darker shade of yellow. Additionally, clicking on a noted word in the sidebar should only highlight the single word that we initially highlighted, but it highlights both words instead.

I was able to reproduce this with the standard hypothesis client in that particular Google search result, but not in other pages.

I think this was a known issue due to how hypothesis detects where the quoted text starts and ends. Let me see if I can find some related issue.

from client.