Better compound word support by COMPOUNDRULE about hunspell HOT 6 OPEN

Logged In: YES
user_id=726595

Hi Harri,

Unfortunatelly, I haven’t synchronised then new COMPOUNDRULE
function with the morphological analysis, yet. I will fix it
in the next version of Hunspell.

I will also rewrite the morphological data handling in the
next couple of months.

Many thanks for your detailed bug report!

Laci

Original comment by: nemethl

from hunspell.

- assigned_to: nobody —> nemethl

Original comment by: nemethl

from hunspell.

Logged In: YES
user_id=726595
Originator: NO

Segmentation fault is fixed, but morphological analysis is still missing with COMPOUNDRULE.

Original comment by: nemethl

from hunspell.

Logged In: YES
user_id=726595
Originator: NO

Crash has fixed. New summary about better COMPOUNDRULE support.

Original comment by: nemethl

from hunspell.

- summary: Segmentation fault using hunmorph —> Better compound word support by COMPOUNDRULE

Original comment by: nemethl

from hunspell.

Can anyone provide a set of steps to reproduce one or more issues due to the lack of COMPOUNDRULE support? (so that getting started with this task is easier for people that is not fammiliar with the codebase)

Original comment by: gallaecio

from hunspell.