Tuning R3live for more robustness about r3live HOT 4 CLOSED

From my view, tuning the parameter have a very limited effect on improving the robustness of R3LIVE, the default parameters work well enough in most cases.

Actually, we are still working to make R3LIVE more robust. And, as you know, R3LIVE is of our work at 3 months ago, and we are in developing the next version of R3LIVE.

For the future of our work, please subscribe to the update of our publications and GitHub of our labs.

Reference:
https://mars.hku.hk/
https://github.com/hku-mars
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=V-eYCF8AAAAJ&hl=zh-CN
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JUHU33cAAAAJ&hl=zh-CN

from r3live.

Hello @ziv-lin,

Yeah, I understand that. Default params are working really well in most of the cases.

I just have a doubt is there any effect of lighting conditions and poor calibration on mapping performance? I understand that texture would be dark but other than that any effect on the map generation part?

Thank you

from r3live.

I think it is hard for me to analyze the performance of R3LIVE in those low-light and poor calibration environments. And generally speaking, our VIO subsystem is preferred in those static (i.e., have no dynamic object) environments with enough visual texture (i.e., high contrast).

And, if the environment can not be changed in your case (e.g., add more lights ), I suggest you use a high dynamic range camera with a larger FoV. More over, If you are not care about the sampling time, I suggest you increase the exposure time and lower your moving speed in order to sample a better image.

from r3live.

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

from r3live.