Can't decode 'anonymous' values about gloss HOT 3 CLOSED

these are the types that Gloss handles automatically:
https://github.com/hkellaway/Gloss#the-decode-operator-'

That doesn't include [String : [String : Decodable]] (we could imagine tons of variants like this so Gloss has a minimum set of typical ones)

--

If you want to stay in the semantic pattern of Gloss, consider adding an extension to Decoder and Encoder that decodes/encodes that special value for you (and new <~~ and ~~> operation definitions even).

^ but, that's not necessary - it would only to have your models be consistent in their usage of that operator

from gloss.

Thanks for your answer.
Would you mind to give me a sample code for such extension please?

Regards,
Alexandre

from gloss.

this is psuedocode. i don't know if this will work, just a place to start trying:

extension Decoder {
	
	static func decode(customDictionaryForKey key: String, json: JSON) -> [String : [String : Decodable]]? {
		// logic to extract your type from json, nil if it fails
	}

}


func <~~ <T: JSONDecodable>(key: String, json: JSON) -> [String : Decodable]]? {
    return Decoder.decode(customDictionaryForKey: key, json: json)
}

from gloss.