uniformize H proc naming about hh-bbww HOT 5 CLOSED

Adding comment

following this naming convention.

For single H processes, follow as it is done on the ttH multi lepton codes.

from hh-bbww.

The renaming of the HH is done instead here, in KBFI CombineHarvester

==> that may evolve with some time for the signal extraction methods, so it is easier/faster to do it a posteriori than run again all jobs just because of a fast renaming.

For single H processes, however, you still need to follow as it is done on the ttH multi lepton codes for separating BRs and use the above-mentioned naming convention.
So, this issue is kept open.

from hh-bbww.

Check why ggH and qqH are not on the final results, if maybe they get by mistake merged with "Other" or really just do not pass selections

from hh-bbww.

These processes have their own category (ggH, qqH). The reason why they don't end up in the final datacards is because they're not listed here:

from hh-bbww.

This issue can be closed because the way we handle the histograms that are needed in datacard production has been refactored. With the new approach the splitting of single Higgs and di-Higgs processes by their Higgs decay modes are automatically taken care of.

from hh-bbww.