Defining function rendering settings about servant HOT 6 CLOSED

From @alpmestan on January 22, 2015 1:9

I wholeheartedly agree that this would be nice to have. The current implementation is the result of me putting together just what I needed at that time. We could definitely add an Options or Settings or OutputFormat type or something that would specify how we want the generated javascript to look like. I would just like however to keep the simple use case simple to write, so yeah we could have a generateJS' function next to the current one that supports fancy options, and have the current one be implemented in term of it using default settings to generate the same kind of JS code that we get now.

Does that sound good to you?

from servant.

From @rtrvrtg on January 22, 2015 1:14

Sounds good to me. If we need to provide a default setting, we can set it to be the current, simple output method.

from servant.

From @alpmestan on January 22, 2015 1:19

Perfect. Let me know if you need any help in working on this, although I don't have time to undertake it myself (alone) these days.

from servant.

From @alpmestan on March 26, 2015 11:59

@christian-marie Do you guys still want this to happen or can we close this ticket?

from servant.

Sorry, missed this. @rtrvrtg is no longer working on this so I don't think it will get done.

I think we can close this but I'll hold out 'till someone who know more about the JS stuff to take a look at #143

from servant.

#143 is now closed

from servant.