Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (5)

jobovy avatar jobovy commented on August 30, 2024

I understand the concern about commercial applications. IANAL, but as far as I can tell, there is no open-source license that directly restricts commercial use (GPL allows commercial use, but you have to provide the source and allow it to be shared, which automatically kind of restricts commercial use!). So I don't think that there is a simple solution that would allow BSD/MIT-licensed software packages (like astropy) to use REBOUND, while not allowing commercial applications (such a license would not be considered open source).

from rebound.

techdragon avatar techdragon commented on August 30, 2024

@hannorein Even a switch from GPL to LGPL might be an improvement. Being able to treat the library as a library and respect its LGPL license separately, not requiring users to switch the rest of their project to the GPL would be a welcome improvement.

from rebound.

hannorein avatar hannorein commented on August 30, 2024

@techdragon What do you intend to use REBOUND for?

from rebound.

techdragon avatar techdragon commented on August 30, 2024

Currently the only use I have for Rebound is in games. Rebound is currently the front runner on a very short list of ways I can work out the proper N Body physics involved in a few game ideas I'm thinking about, and since a few of the ideas would actually use realistic N Body physics as part of the overall game design, I was motivated to find out how to do the physics right.

While I can happily use Rebound for my personal prototyping, if I ever want to release one of these games the fact that the GPL, and GPLv3 in particular, is at odds with the current dominant application distribution platforms, such as App Store, Steam, XBox, etc, prevents me doing so. There are terms of service issues about granting of rights that the GPL requires that the terms of service explicitly reserve, and with the GPLv3 and possibly even the LGPLv3 (its not 100% clear in the LGPLv3 case) there are issues with code signing of application bundles and v3.

from rebound.

hannorein avatar hannorein commented on August 30, 2024

Thanks for the explanation. I don't see this use case as a good reason to change the license. However, you can always ask for permission to use REBOUND in such a project!

from rebound.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.