Two consecutive Arrays causes second one not to be read about commandline HOT 4 CLOSED

Received. Thanks for reporting! I'll check ASAP...
Giacomo

from commandline.

Hi, in my first investigation it seems that the problem can be avoided forcing the use of option with just short name when mapped as OptionArray.
Try launch your app as:

app.exe --source d:/document.docx --output d:/document.xlsx -h 0 1 1 1 -c 0 2 1 2 --verbose

In this case for consistency you should remove long name from option definition to avoid confusion.

Warning, this is just a workaround! Not the final solution.

Summer heat allowing :D , I'll try to write some new unit tests for isolate this issue and finally solve it!
Every progress will be posted here and source code will be updated.

Regards,
Giacomo

from commandline.

@m1gu3l I'm writing a new unit test that should definitely solve the problem.

Thank :D for your infinite patient!

Also forgive for not trying merging PR, I was accustomed to use SVN in my internal organization and getting really familiar with Git/GitHub just in these last times.

I really appreciate any help and please never see a bad intention when some PR is not merged, a reply is not given soon or similar things... :)

from commandline.

// Given
var options = new OptionsWithTwoArrays();
var parser = new Parser();
var argumets = new[] { "--source", @"d:/document.docx", "--output", @"d:/document.xlsx",
        "--headers", "1", "2", "3", "4",  // first array
        "--content", "5", "6", "7", "8",  // second array
        "--verbose"
    };

// When
var result = parser.ParseArguments(argumets, options);

// Than
result.Should().BeTrue();
options.Headers.Should().HaveCount(c => c == 4);
options.Headers.Should().ContainInOrder(new uint[] { 1, 2, 3, 4 });
options.Content.Should().HaveCount(c => c == 4);
options.Content.Should().ContainInOrder(new uint[] { 5, 6, 7, 8 });

If possible, please provide feedback.

from commandline.