Hi <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="

But why are they charging license fee ? <a href="https://www.teamdev

Have a look at this StackOverflow question :<a href="https://stackove

github sites about javafx-web-browser HOT 14 OPEN

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024

github sites

from javafx-web-browser.

Comments (14)

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024 1

Yes my friend it's amazing news with Java 11, i may start heavily updating this web browser again. Until then JxBrowser is the solution at least for me. It's almost exactly like Google Chrome, except the mp4 decodes etc which you need to get a license too.... Check it here https://www.teamdev.com/jxbrowser Have also a look on XR3Player using it : https://github.com/goxr3plus/XR3Player

…

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018, 04:07 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote: JavaFX's webengine is based on webkit, you know. Webkit is not that bad. It's just that JavaFX development has been very slow and they use older version of webkit and is forever playing catchup :( I'm glad that beginning Java 11, the JavaFX portion will be handed to developers. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwDiHEIAIglx_YRBF-gWrHOmg3R1Bks5uN5a-gaJpZM4VveHR> .

from javafx-web-browser.

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024

My dear friend i currently stopped supporting this library because of issues like that. The engine behind JavaFX WebBrowser is badly outdated. It can't even play full hd youtube videos. I think it has to do eith some background parsing.... :)

…

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 20:50 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @goxr3plus <https://github.com/goxr3plus>, Have you investigated why github sites won't work ? e.g. if I type in https://github.com/goxr3plus/JavaFX-Web-Browser, it won't render correctly. I'm using Java 9/10 64-bit in Windows It almost looks like a crypto issue. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwCUUlOmkzFag-PTRt_vm0FH7yn6yks5uNzBJgaJpZM4VveHR> .

from javafx-web-browser.

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024

I am working on another Browser right now based on Chromium engine. Google seaech JxBrowser Java. I am building a JavaFX Browser on top of it. OpenSource :)

…

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 22:04 GoXR3Plus Studio ***@***.***> wrote: My dear friend i currently stopped supporting this library because of issues like that. The engine behind JavaFX WebBrowser is badly outdated. It can't even play full hd youtube videos. I think it has to do eith some background parsing.... :) On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 20:50 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi @goxr3plus <https://github.com/goxr3plus>, > > Have you investigated why github sites won't work ? > > e.g. if I type in https://github.com/goxr3plus/JavaFX-Web-Browser, it > won't render correctly. > > I'm using Java 9/10 64-bit in Windows > > It almost looks like a crypto issue. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#5>, or mute the > thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwCUUlOmkzFag-PTRt_vm0FH7yn6yks5uNzBJgaJpZM4VveHR> > . >

from javafx-web-browser.

mokun commented on May 23, 2024

is JxBrowser fully open source ? how frequent do they update the chromium engine ?

from javafx-web-browser.

mokun commented on May 23, 2024

JavaFX's webengine is based on webkit, you know. Webkit is not that bad.

It's just that JavaFX development has been very slow and they use older version of webkit and is forever playing catchup :(

I'm glad that beginning Java 11, the JavaFX portion will be handed to developers.

from javafx-web-browser.

mokun commented on May 23, 2024

But why are they charging license fee ?

https://www.teamdev.com/jxbrowser#licensing-pricing

Evaluation Support
Provided for 30 days

Also, do they use webkit for video ?

JxBrowser is using Webkit and FFmpeg components, supplied under LGPL.

from javafx-web-browser.

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024

they just if you want to use it commercially, you know they have to survive as a company. Really i didn't knew they used WebKit.....

…

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 00:08 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote: But why are they charging license fee ? https://www.teamdev.com/jxbrowser#licensing-pricing Evaluation Support Provided for 30 days Also, do they use webkit for video ? JxBrowser is using Webkit and FFmpeg components, supplied under LGPL. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwL78ttSru1qT5VmJqFaVFhuJNvWZks5uOLBCgaJpZM4VveHR> .

from javafx-web-browser.

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024

Have a look at this StackOverflow question : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5850338/rendering-webpages-with-webkit-in-java I hope now that JavaFX after separation from standart Java SDK becomes more powerful and frequntly updated. :)

…

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 01:10 GoXR3Plus Studio ***@***.***> wrote: they just if you want to use it commercially, you know they have to survive as a company. Really i didn't knew they used WebKit..... On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 00:08 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote: > But why are they charging license fee ? > > https://www.teamdev.com/jxbrowser#licensing-pricing > > Evaluation Support > Provided for 30 days > > Also, do they use webkit for video ? > > JxBrowser is using Webkit and FFmpeg components, supplied under LGPL. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#5 (comment)>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwL78ttSru1qT5VmJqFaVFhuJNvWZks5uOLBCgaJpZM4VveHR> > . >

from javafx-web-browser.

mokun commented on May 23, 2024

We can use

logger.info("Web Engine supported : " + engine.getUserAgent());

to see what version of webkit the java jdk that we are using.

from javafx-web-browser.

mokun commented on May 23, 2024

For JDK 8u131, it prints the following :

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/602.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) JavaFX/8.0 Safari/602.1

For JDK 10.0.2,

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/605.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) JavaFX/10 Safari/605.1

from javafx-web-browser.

mokun commented on May 23, 2024

I found this page :

https://developers.whatismybrowser.com/useragents/explore/software_name/safari/?order_by=software_version

It's almost same tag info given by engine.getUserAgent() in JavaFX

or in here :
https://developers.whatismybrowser.com/useragents/parse/667339-safari-macos-webkit

605.1 is used by Safari 11.1

from javafx-web-browser.

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024

Awww now i catched it, thank you!!! :)

…

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 01:19 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote: I found this page : https://developers.whatismybrowser.com/useragents/explore/software_name/safari/?order_by=software_version It's the same tag given by engine.getUserAgent() — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwLxgZdxYMqqD4__x1Qu_o_pdrS-pks5uOhJWgaJpZM4VveHR> .

from javafx-web-browser.

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024

Hello my friend , what should i do with this issue ? Soon i will pass this project on Java 11.
@mokun

from javafx-web-browser.

goxr3plus commented on May 23, 2024

@mokun Okay now i have the knowledge to pass this project on Java 11 .

from javafx-web-browser.

github sites about javafx-web-browser HOT 14 OPEN

Comments (14)

Related Issues (13)

Recommend Projects

React

Vue.js

Typescript

TensorFlow

Django

Laravel

D3

Recommend Topics

javascript

web

server

Machine learning

Visualization

Game

Recommend Org

Facebook

Microsoft

Google

Alibaba

D3

Tencent