Present wire as a go generate tool, not a DI framework about wire HOT 5 CLOSED

+1. Generate is more accurate and approachable.

from wire.

"Framework" is the wrong term, no qualms in removing that. "Dependency injection" is the accurate term for what this tool does; code generation is how it does it. I'm not sure how to get around that.

from wire.

Sounds reasonable to me. With "framework" gone, the framing will be much better. Something like, "Wire is a code generation tool that assists the wiring of components using dependency injection." Or something less wordy.

from wire.

This is getting better.

I went through the same thing a month or so ago. I really wanted to find a different term to DI. Unfortunately, Wire is pretty much the dictionary definition of it. That said, we don't have to use the term DI anywhere. We can just say "Wire is a code generation tool that injects reusable components to cloud apps" or something like that.

from wire.

If there's no way to avoid "DI," we could address it head-on. It is DI, but [here] is why it's still idiomatic.

from wire.