Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (7)

wq2012 avatar wq2012 commented on July 28, 2024

@AnzCol Hi Aonan, what are your thoughts here?

from uis-rnn.

AnzCol avatar AnzCol commented on July 28, 2024

from uis-rnn.

wq2012 avatar wq2012 commented on July 28, 2024

@AnzCol I think what @hbredin means is - what if we simply define m_t=x_t, will it still work? Did we have such experiments (my impression is no)?

Personally I don't think it's going to work well.

My understanding is that (@AnzCol please correct me if I'm wrong), the training process forces m_t for each speaker to better fall into a normal distribution. But this is not guaranteed in the distributions of x_t. The power of GRU here is that, to transform the distributions of speaker embeddings into a more clusterable distribution, by learning from the training dataset.

@hbredin Does this explanation make sense to you?

from uis-rnn.

hbredin avatar hbredin commented on July 28, 2024

@AnzCol I think what @hbredin means is - what if we simply define m_t=x_t, will it still work? Did we have such experiments (my impression is no)?

This is what I meant, indeed.

My understanding is that (@AnzCol please correct me if I'm wrong), the training process forces m_t for each speaker to better fall into a normal distribution. But this is not guaranteed in the distributions of x_t. The power of GRU here is that, to transform the distributions of speaker embeddings into a more clusterable distribution, by learning from the training dataset.

Except you are still using raw x_t in Equation 11, so the distribution of speaker embeddings is not changed. Or did I miss something?

@hbredin Does this explanation make sense to you?

Not quite sure -- I think I have to think a bit more about this...
I would really like to see an ablative study with m_t = x_t :-)

from uis-rnn.

zan12 avatar zan12 commented on July 28, 2024

from uis-rnn.

wq2012 avatar wq2012 commented on July 28, 2024

@hbredin Not sure whether this example makes sense: consider two clusters, their distributions of x_t largely overlap with each other, but their distributions of m_t are better separated. Eq. 11 regularizes that m_t should not disjoint too much from x_t.

from uis-rnn.

hbredin avatar hbredin commented on July 28, 2024

Closing as I got the answers I was looking for :-)
Thanks @AnzCol and @wq2012 !

from uis-rnn.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.