Consider contributing a PR for the (ruby-based) opensource Structured Data Linter, to use the prettyHTML component about schemarama HOT 5 CLOSED

Any help on these issues, and others greatly appreciated.

Examples are built with a Rake task after importing raw examples from the schemaorg repo. Adding another tab for a structured view should be straightforward.

Also, the Ruby ShEx implementation is a bit out of date, and could use some love. https://github.com/ruby-rdf/shex.

from schemarama.

Thanks Gregg!

BTW a while back, @gkellogg also integrated the Ruby Linter into schema.org's repo a while back, and we have been slow at updating the examples there to fix the various problems identified. Recently @RichardWallis has been making progress on that, and by happy coincidence Richard and @Gnomus042 spent last week integrating Schemarama into the "Examples" tab of Schema.org. Richard - could you be persuaded to take a look at helping with doing the same on the SD Linter?

Image below is of the https://github.com/google/schemarama/tree/main/pretty-markup UI embedded in schema.org's example tables:

from schemarama.

Should I close this? Where are you on the linter side of things?

@ericprud and I are working on some schemarama updates, but this issue is more about UI and the "pretty"ified view which is now also used for all schema.org's examples.

from schemarama.

The linter supports a structured view for examples (e.g. eg-0427 "structured" in http://linter.structured-data.org/examples/schema.org/Person/ and in linted results).

Any other changes are largely stylistic. Otherwise, I'm not clear on what the specific action is.

from schemarama.

ok let's close for now, maybe there's scope to collaborate more in future but agree the action isn't clear and nobody's owning the problem :)

from schemarama.