ksfetch is annoying about santa HOT 8 CLOSED

ksfetch should be codesigned by "Developer ID: Google Inc" which currently has the SHA256 "15b8ce88e10f04c88a5542234fbdfc1487e9c2f64058a05027c7c34fc4201153".

Is that not what you're seeing?

from santa.

Over and over again.

• David

On Sep 24, 2015, at 6:21 PM, Russell Hancox [email protected] wrote:

ksfetch should be codesigned by "Developer ID: Google Inc" which currently has the SHA256 "15b8ce88e10f04c88a5542234fbdfc1487e9c2f64058a05027c7c34fc4201153".

Is that not what you're seeing?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from santa.

I was going to suggest whitelisting that certificate to whitelist it until I realized the "santactl rule" command doesn't currently support certificate rules. I'm fixing that now.

from santa.

Right, with d905f5b it is now possible to add certificate whiltelist rules, like so:

sudo santactl rule --whitelist --certificate --sha256 15b8ce88e10f04c88a5542234fbdfc1487e9c2f64058a05027c7c34fc4201153

This will be included in the next release.

from santa.

Thanks!
I'll test further.

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:35, Russell Hancox [email protected] wrote:

Right, with d905f5b it is now possible to add certificate whiltelist rules, like so:

sudo santactl rule --whitelist --certificate --sha256 15b8ce88e10f04c88a5542234fbdfc1487e9c2f64058a05027c7c34fc4201153

This will be included in the next release.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from santa.

Did that help?

from santa.

I'm sorry.
Yes. It appears to have.
Didn't I notify? My bad.

-J David Hester, PhD
Alt Pibroch Club
www.altpibroch.com

“I believe the only excuse we have for being musicians
and for making music in any fashion
is to make it differently.”
— Glenn Gould

On Oct 14, 2015, at 14:24, Russell Hancox [email protected] wrote:

Did that help?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from santa.

No worries.

from santa.