rename the 4 operators in "Arithmetic Operators (7. Abstract Concepts)"? about emoji4unicode HOT 8 CLOSED

There are also:

U+2715 MULTIPLICATION X (Dingbats)
U+2716 HEAVY MULTIPLICATION X (Dingbats) 

as well as:

U+00D7 MULTIPLICATION SIGN

Should we unify 2-B53 with U+2716?

e-B51 HEAVY PLUS -> HEAVY PLUS SIGN
I agree.

e-B52 HEAVY MINUS -> HEAVY HYPHEN-MINUS
Considering this is intended as an arithmetic sign, I would vote for "HEAVY 
MINUS SIGN" following U+2212 MINUS 
SIGN

e-B53 HEAVY TIMES -> HEAVY MULTIPLICATION SIGN
It might be reasonable to unify this with U+2716 HEAVY MULTIPLICATION X 
(Dingbats). However, on the other hand 
these four arithmetic symbols comprise a set of basic four arithmetic symbols. 
If so we might want to keep this as a 
separate arithmetic symbol. In that case I agree "HEAVY MULTIPLICATION SIGN" 
would be reasonable following 
U+00D7 MULTIPLICATION SIGN.

e-B54 HEAVY DIVISION -> HEAVY DIVISION SIGN
I agree.

So far we seem to have consensus on
e-B51 HEAVY PLUS -> HEAVY PLUS SIGN and
e-B54 HEAVY DIVISION -> HEAVY DIVISION SIGN

Kida-san proposes e-B52 HEAVY MINUS -> HEAVY MINUS SIGN
and I agree.

Kat asks "Should we unify 2-B53 with U+2716?"
I think we should.

Kida-san, there is no problem with keeping these a set, even if only three 
characters 
are new. Their code points would not all be adjacent, but we can 
cross-reference 
between them. This is much better than having both a "heavy multiplication 
sign" and 
a "heavy multiplication x". We could add "heavy multiplication sign" as an 
alias to 
the existing character.

Will be making the changes as suggested by Kida and Scherer shortly. Scherer's 
last
comment addresses Kida's concern about unifying e-B53 with U+2716 (HEAVY
MULTIPLICATION X: Dingbat).

Thanks markus. We are in agreement.

Fixed in r44.

looks good
updated charts posted to http://www.unicode.org/~scherer/emoji4unicode/snapshot/