Is lilypond 2.23.14 supported? about frescobaldi HOT 9 CLOSED

Did I do it wrong?

You wrote test.py instead of test.ly :D

from frescobaldi.

All versions of LilyPond are normally supported. I am running LilyPond 2.23.14 without problems. I'm not a Frescobaldi dev, but I can ask a few questions to try to know more: what other version(s) of LilyPond do you have? Does this happen on every LilyPond file, including the simplest files like \version "2.23.14" { c' }? Can you try running LilyPond in the command line to see if it works?

from frescobaldi.

Sorry for the late reply @jean-abou-samra.

Here's the output from command line.

➜  Projects cd lilypond-2.23.14 
➜  lilypond-2.23.14 ls
bin  etc  lib  libexec  licenses  share  test.ly
➜  lilypond-2.23.14 cat test.ly        
\version "2.23.14" { c' }
➜  lilypond-2.23.14 ./bin/lilypond test.py
GNU LilyPond 2.23.14 (running Guile 2.2)
warning: cannot find file: `test.py'
fatal error: failed files: "test.py"
➜  lilypond-2.23.14 cd bin             
➜  bin ./lilypond ../test.py
GNU LilyPond 2.23.14 (running Guile 2.2)
warning: cannot find file: `../test.py'
fatal error: failed files: "../test.py"
➜  bin mv ../test.ly .                                        
➜  bin ./lilypond test.py   
GNU LilyPond 2.23.14 (running Guile 2.2)
warning: cannot find file: `test.py'
fatal error: failed files: "test.py"

It's complaining about not being able to find the input file. Did I do it wrong?

from frescobaldi.

@jean-abou-samra Double post. Sorry. But it occurred to me that the working directory was probably wrong. So I did

➜  lilypond-2.23.14 PATH=. ./bin/lilypond test.ly 
GNU LilyPond 2.23.14 (running Guile 2.2)
Processing `test.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
Converting to `test.pdf'...
Success: compilation successfully completed
➜  lilypond-2.23.14 ls
bin  etc  lib  libexec  licenses  share  test.ly  test.pdf

This was what I got.

from frescobaldi.

@nvictor Are you using the flatpak package of Frescobaldi? (I see the versions in your specs are the same)

If the answer is yes, how did you add version 2.23.14? BTW, I'm building a new Frescobaldi flatpak including v2.23.14 right now.

from frescobaldi.

@fedelibre That is correct! I added 2.23.14 by going to the settings.

I unzipped the version in a folder.

from frescobaldi.

You might notice the weird path recorded by Frescobaldi: /run/user/1000/doc/.... It means that you put the lilypond binaries in a path where Frescobaldi flatpak doesn't have full permissions, so lilypond binary won't work. You have two options:

1. Move the binaries in one of the supported locations: ~/Documents, ~/Downloads, ~/Music (see flatpak manifest).
2. Use the Flatseal app to grant the permissions for the directory you're currently using.

This issue has been recently discussed here.

from frescobaldi.

@jean-abou-samra oh my god! 😮

@fedelibre Thanks will try that!

from frescobaldi.

@jean-abou-samra @fedelibre it worked after I moved the binaries to ~/Downloads 👍 👍

Thanks a lot for your help!

from frescobaldi.