Strong-Name Sign Nuget Package about gremlin.net HOT 5 CLOSED

It's not really an oversight. The reason why it's not signed is simply that no one requested that until now and Microsoft seems to advocate against the strong-name signing system nowadays.

Do you need a strong-named version of Gremlin.Net?

from gremlin.net.

Yes please! I am trying to consume Gremlin.net from an assembly that's strong signed, so I'm not able to use it. If you can ship a strong-name signed version of Gremlin.Net to nuget, that would be awesome. Thank you @FlorianHockmann

from gremlin.net.

@FlorianHockmann , Any update on Strong-Name Sign Nuget Package? We are blocked on this because of other dependencies. Any ETA ?

Thanks
Ashwini

from gremlin.net.

Sorry for the delay. I mainly concentrated on the extended version of Gremlin.Net that is now part of Apache TinkerPop (see the README.md for more information).
But I just published version 0.2.2 which is strong-name signed.

I also created a ticket to strong-name sign Gremlin.Net in TinkerPop

from gremlin.net.

@FlorianHockmann , Thanks.

from gremlin.net.