DoveTailJointCounterPart in CompoundEdge about boxes HOT 6 CLOSED

Oh, and if I add bottom='F'I expected the total hight to increase by thickness. Isn't the height argument interpreted as the inner height? At least I was under the impression that some commits before that was the case. I might be wrong.

from boxes.

Well, the surroundingWall was not really ready to have fully parametrized edges. Also nice catch on the "F" width mess up. Both should be fixed now.

from boxes.

I confirm that the "F" width is back to normal with our latest commit. The compound left edge improved somewhat, but does still not render as I would expect it.

Why is there this 90 degree turn to the inside after the "D" edge? I would have expected just a straight line as on the right side.

from boxes.

Ah, now I found where that 90 degree turn to the inside happens. It is in CompoundEdge/call in the elif part. However, I get what I expect (for this example) if I comment the "def startwidth" in DoveTailJointCounterPart.

from boxes.

Yup, the DoveTailJointCounterPart should be width zero so that the DoveTailJoint doesn't need any length of the surrounding wall. Fixed now.

from boxes.

Yes, I think this issue is now closed, however, I now have another "CompoundEdge issue" in another place. I will investigate and potential have to open another issue...

from boxes.