Use the same starting point in all conditions about rune-dsl HOT 3 CLOSED

Agree. In the new syntax, I can't think of a use-case where we will to reference the Type within an Expression. Once we have migrated everything, we look to remove support for references to Type in the grammar.

Your data rule example should then look per the below:

data Foo: 
    attr1:  int
    attr2: string
    condition Foo_rule_1:
		if attr1 exists
		then attr2 exists;

from rune-dsl.

Still needed in synonyms rosettaPath = WorkflowEvent -> eventIdentifier -> assignedIdentifier -> identifier

from rune-dsl.

I'm closing this as the syntax mentioned by @jim-h-wang has been supported for a long time now.

from rune-dsl.