Support Hugo only? about filebrowser HOT 6 CLOSED

I'm all for it. But keep code modular to leave room for contributors and their forks in the future.
There are no other generators besides Hugo ;)

from filebrowser.

I vote to keep it focused - I'd rather have a plugin just for hugo. It'll be easier to maintain and use.

from filebrowser.

So I can do that. I think it's better too. When I've time, I will change it to "caddy-hugo" again and make the changes on csddyserver.com repo and in the registry. I'll wait for your answer @mholt!

Sure it will keeo being modular as it is @adprof!

from filebrowser.

Sounds good to me... make the directive hugo again as well, instead of cms? Since the directive is changing, maybe wait to push it to master until a new Caddy version comes out so users aren't totally surprised. Don't forget to update the docs too. (You can push to another branch other than master in the mean time.)

from filebrowser.

@mholt yes. Why waiting? =P I think it wouldn't be a great problem.

from filebrowser.

TODO: change the directive and repository name.

from filebrowser.