refactor: create mason_cli about mason HOT 2 CLOSED

I prefer mason_cli and mason as the generator. Although it is a breaking change, but that is ok for version 0.0.1-dev 😉

Alternatively mason and mason_generator would be fine too 🤷

from mason.

Hi @passsy 👋
Thanks for opening an issue!

I agree it would make sense to decouple the CLI from the generator (similar to #91). My only comments are:

• universal_io would still be a dependency for the generator because of the I/O and logging (stdout, stderr)
• I'm still not sure if it'd be better to rename mason to mason_cli and keep mason as the generator or whether to keep mason as the cli and create mason_core/mason_generator/mason_engine to contain the generator.

Do you prefer having mason and mason_cli?

Thanks again!

from mason.