Balancing of input parameters about kyoto HOT 11 CLOSED

Using this as a place to store ideas:

The first point of balancing is that we must achieve a drop of 5% year on year. This gives us an idea of how much energy should change year on year, which is a pretty strong change to move forward from. This directly means we can balance GDP changes.

from kyoto.

Further to that, realistic data puts GDP spending as around 0.5%, optimistically, on Clean Energy drives. Realistically, different countries dedicate a different amount to clean energy, generally far less. However, since we can invest in industry also, this will do.

So we need to achieve a 0.5% drop per year with 0.5% of GDP.

from kyoto.

Monitor Tax / Monitoring Price = Number of Countries monitored. Kinda. Need to find the average GDP of all countries to find the sanction rate.

from kyoto.

Sanctioning needs to be proportionate to the risk of get caught while cheating and the cost needed to reduce carbon by the 0.5% needed

from kyoto.

Carbon Reduction and Carbon absorption need to be a comparable cost ideally. The amount to the reduce by should be roughly equal to a proportion of the given money and the energy drop needed per round.

from kyoto.

Some calculations:
avg ALA : 15%
avg DI : 72%
avg Drop/y : 10685430
avg GDP : 158788
avg cash : 793.94

from kyoto.

Avg ALA/CarbonOuput ~ 5500

from kyoto.

2.6 tonnes of co2 per acre.

0.3846 acres per tonne.

0.0156 km^2 per tonne

http://www.treesintrust.com/environmental.shtm

from kyoto.

For carbon Investment price.

The investment cost > the return for the next few years gained by increasing GDP.

from kyoto.

Need to look at the cost to achieve an increase of energyOutput by a certain percentage

from kyoto.

Going to call this done for the moment. Not going to continue working on it unless I get some feedback

from kyoto.