In resnet's paper, it claims that Resnet50/101/152 have lower FLOPS compared to VGG16/

<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/us

running time of ResNets about fb.resnet.torch HOT 5 OPEN

1292765944 commented on August 25, 2024

running time of ResNets

from fb.resnet.torch.

Comments (5)

aabobakr commented on August 25, 2024

This is the running time of a forward pass for each of these models on a CPU and a TITAN-X GPU

                               CPU            TITAN-X GPU
        VGG16                648  ms             25 ms   
        ResNet-50            544  ms             18 ms
        ResNet-101           1072 ms             33 ms           
        ResNet-152           1584 ms             43 ms

from fb.resnet.torch.

1292765944 commented on August 25, 2024

@aabobakr I have similar running time on ResNet-50/101/152. However, I run VGG16 using caffe(with cudnn 5.1, TITAN X GPU maxwell), it only costs me 12ms.
By the way, what do you think about the relationship between FLOPS and running time?

Best!

from fb.resnet.torch.

408550969 commented on August 25, 2024

Hi,does anyone test the speed of resnet-18? Thanks!

from fb.resnet.torch.

aabobakr commented on August 25, 2024

This is the running time of a forward pass of different models a Core i-7 CPU and a TITAN-X GPU: the time is average over 1000 iterations.

                           Core-i7 CPU         TITAN-X GPU
        VGG11                155  ms             13 ms
        VGG16                280  ms             24 ms   
        ResNet-18            52   ms             4  ms
        ResNet-34            97   ms             8  ms
        ResNet-50            544  ms             18 ms
        ResNet-101           1072 ms             33 ms           
        ResNet-152           1584 ms             43 ms

from fb.resnet.torch.

408550969 commented on August 25, 2024

Thanks!

from fb.resnet.torch.

Recommend Projects