change description: Ember for Rails 3.1+ about ember-rails HOT 16 CLOSED

Oh BTW think of this as a pull request for github metadata. I didn't mean to sound any more direct than that. :)

from ember-rails.

Yeah, @wycats needs to update that for me :)

from ember-rails.

@keithpitt maybe it's because it doesn't work with Rails 3.2?

Just kidding. Most of the apps that people claimed didn't work with Rails 3.1 actually did because the asset pipeline is optional. I wish more programmers cared about the accuracy of their statements. Heh.

from ember-rails.

ember-rails works with both Rails 3.1 & 3.2. But it uses the asset pipeline. It works the same was a jquery-rails does. Who are these people that claim it doesn't work? Perhaps I need to enlighten them.

from ember-rails.

I wasn't talking about ember-js in reference to Rails 3.1...I was just saying that compatibility across Rails 3.x isn't as brittle as people claim. But next time I see someone bitching about how Rails 3.1 (and not the asset pipeline) broke their app I'll be sure to say something.

from ember-rails.

Ah right, sorry I misunderstood. It thought you mean't people were talking about ember-js :D

It'd be nice for me to somehow mark a gem as being "asset pipeline" required. So if you include it in your gem, your server won't start up with an error "Rails pipeline is necessary for this..." or something like that.

from ember-rails.

The gemspec tells yet another thing (it is code, so it is the truth or it is a bug):

s.add_dependency "railties", [">= 3.0"]

s.add_development_dependency "rails", [">= 3.0"]

from ember-rails.

Would be nice to normalize all the 3.x too, I think it infers that it works on any Rails 3 version (not what other descriptions say).

from ember-rails.

I fixed dependency to require rails ~> 3.1
Changed README to 3.1+

from ember-rails.

@tchak Can we close this then?

from ember-rails.

You could change it to 3.1+ in the repository description, too (GitHub metadata). But other than that it looks like it's fixed.

from ember-rails.

I do not have acces to repository metadata, this is why I did not close it. @wagenet can you change the repo description and the link?

from ember-rails.

Ah, didn't even notice that the link pointed to the wrong GitHub Pages. Doesn't seem quite so frivolous suggesting it be changed. :)

from ember-rails.

We also need to change the link on rubygems.org page

from ember-rails.

I've changed the repo description. I don't think I have access to the gem.

from ember-rails.

Link on the rubygems site fixed

from ember-rails.