Tests stating no protection with Privacy Badger and Firefox about cover-your-tracks HOT 6 CLOSED

Hello!

Speaking from Privacy Badger's perspective, test three is failing because of https://github.com/EFForg/badger-sett/issues/59#issuecomment-719974612 and EFForg/privacybadger#2708 (comment).

Tests one and two are probably also failing because of https://github.com/EFForg/badger-sett/issues/59#issuecomment-719974612

Test four failing is a long-outstanding issue: #53

from cover-your-tracks.

To summarize, recent-ish changes made as part of https://www.eff.org/badger-evolution broke the first three tests.

The fingerprinting test has been broken for a long time because (my current understanding is that) what Panopticlick tests for and what Privacy Badger actually does about fingerprinting are misaligned.

from cover-your-tracks.

Thanks for the informations. But why are the tests in Chromium-Edge without its tracking protection and with the same Privacy Badger version (with disabled automatic learning) not failing?

from cover-your-tracks.

But why are the tests in Chromium-Edge without its tracking protection and with the same Privacy Badger version (with disabled automatic learning) not failing?

I think this is another bug, #54

I don't know why the "acceptable ads" test passes though.

from cover-your-tracks.

This will be fixed in the next Privacy Badger update.

from cover-your-tracks.

This should be fixed.

from cover-your-tracks.