Did the BundleID change? about orbit HOT 1 CLOSED

I think this ip lab issue was asking an analogous question so the same information applies:

https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/10729

The dash scanner does significantly more than look at pom.xml files. It also appears to monitor Tycho's processing of *.target files including Tycho's processing of the BND instructions used to wrap a Maven non-OSGi artifact as an OSGi bundle.

I see this in the log for the processing of the Maven GAV org.commonmark:commonmark-ext-gfm-tables:0.21.0:

[INFO] org.commonmark:commonmark-ext-gfm-tables:0.21.0 is wrapped as a bundle with bundle symbolic name org.commonmark-gfm-tables
[INFO] The artifact can be referenced in feature files with the following data: <plugin id="org.commonmark-gfm-tables" version="0.21.0.v20230927-1332" download-size="0" install-size="0" unpack="false"/>
...
[INFO] A review request already exists https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/10732 .
[INFO] A review is required for p2/orbit/p2.eclipse.plugin/org.commonmark-gfm-tables/0.21.0.v20230927-1332.

This naming/version pattern is used because that was what was used in the past by Orbit EBR-baed builds which presumably haven been IP reviewed in the past:

• https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/N20230908195041/repository/plugins/com.atlassian.commonmark-gfm-tables_0.15.1.v20221112-0806.jar
• https://github.com/eclipse-orbit/orbit/blob/main/commonmark/com.atlassian.commonmark-gfm-tables_0.15.1/osgi.bnd

So yes, the latter is derived from the former, and the naming is often driven by what was done previous by the Orbit EBR builds so that the resulting bundles retain the same symbolic name as was historically the case.

from orbit.