expression precedence table in introduction missing nameof(x) about csharplang HOT 4 CLOSED

Thanks, good catch!

Since this isn't yet authoritative source, I'll keep these spec defects around for later application.

from csharplang.

Not sure how much it is needed. Syntactically, a nameof expression is treated as an invocation expression.

from csharplang.

The elvis operators are also missing (I'm not entirely sure how to even bring that up; are they unary in this table based on this?). I suppose it comes down to whether the table here is an authoritative source vs a high level summary of the language's expressions.

Syntactically to the rest of the spec nameof doesn't seem much different than checked(x), unchecked(x) or default(T) which are all in the table except for the quirk where it might not be a keyword and then becomes an invocation expression.

from csharplang.

I'm closing this. This entire clause has been removed from the C# standard in V5. The new expressions are added in the expressions chapter in the correct location.

from csharplang.