Assertion 6.5.8 about redfish-service-conformance-check HOT 2 CLOSED

Yes, it doesn't look like the code in Assertion_6_5_8() is doing the right thing. For one thing, I don't think this if statement is doing what was intended (txt_files is the list of all schemas from redfish.dmtf.org and list1 is the list of schemas referenced by the resources on the service):

    if list1 in txt_files:
         assertion_status = log.PASS
    else :
        assertion_status = log.FAIL

It should be using set() operations for the test instead.

But before debugging it further, it seems like this assertion is already better covered by the service-validator, so maybe it is better just to disable it here?

from redfish-service-conformance-check.

For reference, here is the spec requirement that Assertion_6_5_8() is supposed to be testing:

6.5.3.1.1. Referencing other schemas

The service metadata shall include the namespaces for each of the Redfish resource types, along with the "RedfishExtensions.v1_0_0" namespace. These references may use the standard URI for the hosted Redfish Schema definitions (i.e., on http://redfish.dmtf.org/schemas) or a URI to a local version of the Redfish Schema that shall be identical to the hosted version.

from redfish-service-conformance-check.