Inject struct fields about di HOT 1 CLOSED

@zeromake Hi! Thank you for your interest.

I understand your problem. But I wouldn't want the code to be unable to be used without a container. This approach creates a direct connection between the container and the package that contains such a constructor. And if you use the constructor without a container, you will get a non-working code. I would like to avoid this.
On the other hand, this is an optional feature. This does not change the normal workflow. In general, it can be merged.

As an alternative, how do you look to introduce the di.ProvideValue() with di.ResolvePublicFields() provide option (need to think about naming):

di.ProvideValue(&Controller{}, di.ResolvePublicFields()),

If di.ResolvePublicFields() is specified, the container will bypass the public properties of the type and inject dependencies in them without tags.

from di.