Clarify similar classes about contributor-role-ontology HOT 5 CLOSED

Great question, @diatomsRcool. I don't think systems administrator role and systems administration role are different (even though they are classified under different parents. I think we should obsolete
CRO_0000077 'systems administration role'

Here is a suggested def for CRO_0000051 'system administrator role'
def: A software systems role that involves maintenance and operation of a computer system and/or network.
syn: sysadmin role
source: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q327353

from contributor-role-ontology.

program administration role and project administration role have the same text defs:

'program administration role'
Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.

Suggested revision:
An infrastructure role that is accountable for management and coordination of a program, to help achieve the program goals.

'project administration role'
def:
Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.

from contributor-role-ontology.

supervision role and supervisory role also have the same defs:

supervision role:
parent: 'contributor role'
Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.

supervisory role:
parent: 'infrastructure role'
def: Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.

I think maybe we could obsolete supervisory role? I don't see how it is different.

from contributor-role-ontology.

Agreed they seem the same to me. I don't think the infrastructure role as the parent is correct though, there can be many other kinds of supervision. So yes, I'd obsolete the latter.

from contributor-role-ontology.

it looks like all of these were inadvertent duplicates of existing CRediT roles.

from contributor-role-ontology.