Request - prevent renaming of protobuf message fields about go-proto-gql HOT 8 OPEN

hi @westongcooper this is possible using the name field option https://github.com/danielvladco/go-proto-gql/blob/master/pb/graphql.proto#L27

Check this example:
https://github.com/danielvladco/go-proto-gql/blob/master/example/codegen/pb/options.proto#L64

from go-proto-gql.

I am working on this project on my spare time, I don't really have a roadmap. But it looks like not a lot of work, so I will try to check it over the weekend.

from go-proto-gql.

Hey @westongcooper , sorry for long wait, I've been busy lately. I will have some changes in a few days

from go-proto-gql.

Is it possible to use this field options for a oneof message type?

message Image {
    oneof _type {
        string url    = 1;
        Upload upload = 2;
        option (gql.field) = {name: "_type"};
    }
}

I get the following error with the above option.
Option field "(gql.field)" is not a field or extension of message "OneofOptions".

from go-proto-gql.

It is not supported on oneof's yet

from go-proto-gql.

@danielvladco any guesses how far out support for oneofs might be?

from go-proto-gql.

Any guess when we'll see an update?

from go-proto-gql.

@westongcooper @kogi check this PR #32 . The name applies only for generated graphql types and not inputs since the inputs don't use oneof as fields but rather take all oneof fields and flattens them into the parent input

from go-proto-gql.