[question] Components requirements to transitive library about conan HOT 5 CLOSED

Hi @joastoe

Thanks for your question.

I am afraid no, this is by design. If a package doesn't express a explicit requires = "libb/..., then it cannot use it in is recipe or code. It is considered an implementation detail of liba, that might exist or not, but it cannot be explicitly referenced.

Note that if your package code has direct #include to libb headers, then it is considered a direct dependency, and it must have a requires = "libb/..." to it. Is this the case? And if it is the case, why would it be an issue to declare the requires?

from conan.

Thanks @memsharded for this fast answer.

Indeed, compB has a direct dependency to libB. But not to libA. This is why I would not add libA as a dependency to compB, altough it could work.

My concern by adding libB to requires is to run into a version conflict. Because libA could request a different version of libB than mypackage.

from conan.

My concern by adding libB to requires is to run into a version conflict. Because libA could request a different version of libB than mypackage.

The moment that there is a direct dependency of compB to libB, the conflict effects are already a risk, no matter of the direct or indirect declaration of requires. Because the consumer has #includes that can break by using one version or another of the dependency, conflicts arising because of different versions will result in compilation errors anyway, with a much more complicated diagnosis than if failing fast because Conan detected.

The recommended way to deal with possible conflicts and minimize them is to use version ranges. If libA contains a requires to a fixed version of libB, then using the same version wouldn't be an issue if libA doesn't automatically upgrade it within the same revision. But still, it is possible to define a version range that includes the compatible versions of libB and as long as they match the declaration of the requires in libA, they will not conflict. And if they conflict, then it is good they do, because if the range is correct it would mean there will be a conflict and error in code anyway.

from conan.

Thanks for this explanation. I'll then add libB to requires.

from conan.

Thanks for this explanation. I'll then add libB to requires.

Sounds good. I'll close the ticket as responded, but please feel free to open new tickets for any further question you might have. Thanks for the feedback!

from conan.