Outdated pypi package about sdk-python HOT 6 CLOSED

@evankanderson @di I would like to publish v1.0.0-dev this week if possible. Any feedback on additional issues we should resolve before publishing would be appreciated!

from sdk-python.

@cumason123 Should we consider publishing a pre-release on PyPI first, to allow consumers to test before publishing 1.0.0?

from sdk-python.

Sounds good. Things seem pretty stable and Curtis has added a lot of improvements with PRs.
I think we can go with a normal release unless there's a good reason for a prerelease? Not sure which consumers we'd expect to get feedback from within some timeframe.

from sdk-python.

• Regular release should be fine. (Not pre-release)
• GitHub Action – Release on merge (https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish)
  • Previously had release.sh w/ env var with version
  • AI: @di to set secret on GitHub
  • Ping @di for PR review

from sdk-python.

My only question/comment would be if the current API (as cloudevents.sdk.??? with base, http, etc) is the API that you want to publish for v1.0. (You can always ship a v2.0, and I think the Go API has already done so, so perhaps having something published as v1.0 and then cleaning up from there makes sense.)

from sdk-python.

I'm working on a follow-up PR to reduce the import schema from cloudevents.sdk.??? to cloudevents.???. Issue creations are starting to die down so I'm hoping the cloudevents community can provide more feedback before I update the package, but you're correct in stating we can always adjust through later minor version updates.

Feel free to provide more issues/concerns regarding the current API and I'll be sure to implement them.
@evankanderson

from sdk-python.