[Bug]: Show full model description about civitai HOT 4 OPEN

Model descriptions are too long to have them show all of the time, and most likely even if we did show them, people wouldn't read them anyway.

You mention a few uses for the description area, and we've done things to address each of them that should eliminate the need for too much in the description:

1. Description: Yes, this should go in the description
2. Prompts (Representation?): No, this should be in the example images. Any prompts/guides in the description should be considered as extra.
3. Usage Restrictions: Yes (kind of), if you have something other than the Open-Rail license you should include that in the description. However, it's worth noting that the Permission indication system should be used so that users can more quickly digest what's acceptable.

In regards to licenses, we do include the Open-rail license on all checkpoint pages (as required by the license). We haven't added support for custom licenses at this time.

from civitai.

You should work around that then by having description be tabbed with versions (since version description is hardly used and can be condensed like it is. Often there is just one version, so the version block is a huge redundant area wasting space over far more focused content regarding the model. Honestly the top section could just be tabbed for versions since it's already got an image block and download block (considering newest file gets most downloads, even if other versions are related to other subjects it's obviously not really referred to being at the bottom of the page over the download button at the top.)

A model should be a users page, to represent their model. Not summarized for consumption. That's very counter intuitive of content sharing, and not really supportive of the authors driving the site (especially paying).

Regarding Open-Rail, it's not about displaying it with the model, it has to distribute with the model. That's the stipulation with any of the models use or derivatives (TIs, LoRas, etc), and that also naturally entails any license a user would put it under subsequently, as usually always required of a license (I've never seen a license that doesn't require this). This is legally required with licensed products (free or otherwise) because once downloaded, and referred to later: where does it come from? What's it's usage? etc. This is echoed in the fact model names don't seem to be searchable and often don't relate to the model's title on the site.

from civitai.

Regarding Open-Rail, it's not about displaying it with the model, it has to distribute with the model. That's the stipulation with any of the models use or derivatives (TIs, LoRas, etc), and that also naturally entails any license a user would put it under subsequently, as usually always required of a license (I've never seen a license that doesn't require this). This is legally required with licensed products (free or otherwise) because once downloaded, and referred to later: where does it come from? What's it's usage? etc. This is echoed in the fact model names don't seem to be searchable and often don't relate to the model's title on the site.

How are other sites handling this? As far as I can tell everywhere you can download the SD models just also offer you the License file for download.

from civitai.

Regarding Open-Rail, it's not about displaying it with the model, it has to distribute with the model. That's the stipulation with any of the models use or derivatives (TIs, LoRas, etc), and that also naturally entails any license a user would put it under subsequently, as usually always required of a license (I've never seen a license that doesn't require this). This is legally required with licensed products (free or otherwise) because once downloaded, and referred to later: where does it come from? What's it's usage? etc. This is echoed in the fact model names don't seem to be searchable and often don't relate to the model's title on the site.

How are other sites handling this? As far as I can tell everywhere you can download the SD models just also offer you the License file for download.

I don't know that what other sites do matters. This is just what the license requires. The only "official" form of download packages up the whole HF repo, including license, unless you go through and download each file of the model one by one (for Diffusers models, or ckpt by itself). So maybe a mini repo type deal could be in order, download all the files in a zip, or just manually download the model by itself, but that would have to be explicitly a users choice to not be breaching the license as far as distribution clause goes.

Also with HF Hub, you explicitly agree to the license in code, downloading the models, and it's stored with the code as well.

Technically we we're all supposed to agree to terms and conditions and license on HF gateways to download models, to make sure people understand the license, but that only is enabled on SD official models, and certain other ones it seems, even though the original license does cover all derivatives (fine-tunes, tis, loras, anything made with SD)

from civitai.