Finalize standard front matter and other content that will be included in all baselines about scubagear HOT 11 CLOSED

@adhilto Can you please provide a reference to a publicly available document that defines the SHALL vs. SHOULD? Also do we have other terms that need definition such as MAY? If yes, can you provide the language for that too. Thank u!

Had a blast from the past to that 2 hour 6 a.m meeting last year.
RFC2119 was what was brought up as our source for the SHALL/SHOULD
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119

from scubagear.

@adhilto Can you please provide a reference to a publicly available document that defines the SHALL vs. SHOULD? Also do we have other terms that need definition such as MAY? If yes, can you provide the language for that too. Thank u!

Had a blast from the past to that 2 hour 6 a.m meeting last year. RFC2119 was what was brought up as our source for the SHALL/SHOULD https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119

The quote below from the link is very relevant to this issue ^^ " Authors who follow these guidelines should incorporate this phrase near the beginning of their document:

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
  NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and
  "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
  [RFC 2119](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119).

"

Alden posted this elsewhere. Reposting

For April Fools, we should replace the link to RFC 2119 with RFC 6919 :)

from scubagear.

@adhilto Can you please provide a reference to a publicly available document that defines the SHALL vs. SHOULD? Also do we have other terms that need definition such as MAY? If yes, can you provide the language for that too. Thank u!

Had a blast from the past to that 2 hour 6 a.m meeting last year. RFC2119 was what was brought up as our source for the SHALL/SHOULD https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119

The quote below from the link is very relevant to this issue ^^
"
Authors who follow these guidelines
should incorporate this phrase near the beginning of their document:

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
  NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and
  "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
  [RFC 2119](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119).

"

from scubagear.

@gdasher Can you kindly provide definitions for SHALL versus SHOULD that you would like to include in the baseline? Also, where would you like the reference to the hybrid solutions document, what should that say and what URL should that reference?
Thanks!

from scubagear.

@adhilto Can you please provide a reference to a publicly available document that defines the SHALL vs. SHOULD? Also do we have other terms that need definition such as MAY? If yes, can you provide the language for that too. Thank u!

from scubagear.

Or did they mean SHOULD incorporate? 😄

from scubagear.

@gdasher Can you please provide a sentence or two on what you want included regarding the Hybrid Identity document?

Do you want that at the top of the AAD baseline? In other baselines as well or just AAD?

from scubagear.

@gdasher pinging again. See previous comment.

from scubagear.

updated the front-matter and acknowledgements, also included the link to RFC 2119.

from scubagear.

current status is that the front-matter and acknowledgements have been submitted to CISA for review!

from scubagear.

front matter and acknowledgements have been approved by CISA and updated in the example markdown

from scubagear.