Comments (14)
lmb
commented on May 29, 2024
Hi!
That's probably because you're the first s390x user :) Note the following:
0: LdXMemW dst: r2 src: r1 off: 4 imm: 0
vs.
0: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 +4)
The operands are switched: the library thinks it's emitting r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 4), but the verifier tells us the opposite.
Can you give me some more information about your system (kernel, userspace)? Is it running in big endian mode?
from ebpf.
alicefr
commented on May 29, 2024
hi @lmb
:) yes, I guess we're the first who use this package on s390. So here the info:
$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME=Fedora
VERSION="31 (Thirty One)"
ID=fedora
VERSION_ID=31
VERSION_CODENAME=""
PLATFORM_ID="platform:f31"
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 31 (Thirty One)"
ANSI_COLOR="0;34"
LOGO=fedora-logo-icon
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:31"
HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/"
DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f31/system-administrators-guide/"
SUPPORT_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/"
REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=31
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=31
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy"
$ uname -rm
5.3.7-301.fc31.s390x s390xyes, it is running in bigendian mode. Probably, there's some endianness issue somewhere in the code. Having a look
from ebpf.
lmb
commented on May 29, 2024
Yeah, I think https://github.com/cilium/ebpf/blob/master/asm/instruction.go#L435-L445 needs to be swapped for big endian. Annoying, since the registers are encoded as an uint8, which binary.ByteOrder doesn't support natively.
from ebpf.
alicefr
commented on May 29, 2024
@lmb I tried a quick hack
git diff
diff --git a/asm/instruction.go b/asm/instruction.go
index 644de42..ae6f3a0 100644
--- a/asm/instruction.go
+++ b/asm/instruction.go
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ func (ins Instruction) Marshal(w io.Writer, bo binary.ByteOrder) (uint64, error)
bpfi := bpfInstruction{
ins.OpCode,
- newBPFRegisters(ins.Dst, ins.Src),
+ newBPFRegisters(ins.Src, ins.Dst),
ins.Offset,
cons,
}
$ go test -run TestProgramRun
PASS
ok github.com/cilium/ebpf 0.002sand it worked. You were right!
from ebpf.
lmb
commented on May 29, 2024
Do all of the other tests pass on s390x?
from ebpf.
alicefr
commented on May 29, 2024
@lmb unfortunately not.
go test
--- FAIL: TestLoadCollectionSpec (0.00s)
--- FAIL: TestLoadCollectionSpec/loader-clang-6.0.elf (0.00s)
elf_reader_test.go:85: xdp_prog:
0: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 0
1: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -4 imm: 0
2: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 1
3: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -8 imm: 0
4: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 2
5: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -12 imm: 0
6: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
7: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -4
8: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map>
10: Call FnMapLookupElem
11: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
12: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -8
13: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map2>
15: Call FnMapLookupElem
16: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
17: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -12
18: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map2>
20: Call FnMapLookupElem
21: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 1
22: Call -1 <global_fn>
23: AddImm dst: r0 imm: 1
24: Exit
global_fn2:
25: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
26: Exit
global_fn:
27: MovReg dst: r6 src: r1
28: Call 10
29: MovReg dst: r7 src: r0
30: MovReg dst: r1 src: r6
31: Call -7
32: MovReg dst: r8 src: r0
33: AddReg dst: r8 src: r7
34: MovReg dst: r1 src: r6
35: Call -1 <global_fn3>
36: AddReg dst: r8 src: r0
37: MovReg dst: r0 src: r8
38: Exit
static_fn:
39: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
40: Exit
global_fn3:
41: AddImm dst: r1 imm: 1
42: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
43: Exit
elf_reader_test.go:94: program xdp_prog: can't load program: errno 524: 0: (b7) r1 = 0
1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1
2: (b7) r1 = 1
3: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r1
4: (b7) r1 = 2
5: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -12) = r1
6: (bf) r2 = r10
7: (07) r2 += -4
8: (18) r1 = 0x1fbd42800
10: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
11: (bf) r2 = r10
12: (07) r2 += -8
13: (18) r1 = 0x1fbd42000
15: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
16: (bf) r2 = r10
17: (07) r2 += -12
18: (18) r1 = 0x1fbd42000
20: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
21: (b7) r1 = 1
22: (85) call pc+4
caller:
R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm fp-16=mmmm????
callee:
frame1: R1_w=invP1 R10=fp0
27: (bf) r6 = r1
28: (85) call pc+10
caller:
frame1: R6_w=invP1 R10=fp0
callee:
frame2: R1_w=invP1 R10=fp0
39: (bf) r0 = r1
40: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame2: R0_w=invP1 R1=invP1 R10=fp0
to caller at 29:
frame1: R0_w=invP1 R6=invP1 R10=fp0
from 40 to 29: frame1: R0_w=invP1 R6=invP1 R10=fp0
29: (bf) r7 = r0
30: (bf) r1 = r6
31: (85) call pc-7
caller:
frame1: R6=invP1 R7_w=invP1 R10=fp0
callee:
frame2: R1_w=invP1 R10=fp0
25: (bf) r0 = r1
26: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame2: R0_w=invP1 R1_w=invP1 R10=fp0
to caller at 32:
frame1: R0_w=invP1 R6=invP1 R7_w=invP1 R10=fp0
from 26 to 32: frame1: R0_w=invP1 R6=invP1 R7_w=invP1 R10=fp0
32: (bf) r8 = r0
33: (0f) r8 += r7
34: (bf) r1 = r6
35: (85) call pc+5
caller:
frame1: R6=invP1 R7=invP1 R8=invP2 R10=fp0
callee:
frame2: R1=invP1 R10=fp0
41: (07) r1 += 1
42: (bf) r0 = r1
43: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame2: R0_w=invP2 R1_w=invP2 R10=fp0
to caller at 36:
frame1: R0_w=invP2 R6=invP1 R7=invP1 R8=invP2 R10=fp0
from 43 to 36: frame1: R0_w=invP2 R6=invP1 R7=invP1 R8=invP2 R10=fp0
36: (0f) r8 += r0
37: (bf) r0 = r8
38: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame1: R0_w=invP4 R6=invP1 R7=invP1 R8_w=invP4 R10=fp0
to caller at 23:
R0_w=invP4 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm fp-16=mmmm????
from 38 to 23: R0_w=invP4 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm fp-16=mmmm????
23: (07) r0 += 1
24: (95) exit
JIT doesn't support bpf-to-bpf calls
processed 41 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 3 peak_states 3 mark_read 1
--- FAIL: TestLoadCollectionSpec/loader-clang-7.elf (0.00s)
elf_reader_test.go:85: xdp_prog:
0: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 0
1: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -4 imm: 0
2: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 1
3: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -8 imm: 0
4: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 2
5: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -12 imm: 0
6: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
7: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -4
8: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map>
10: Call FnMapLookupElem
11: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
12: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -8
13: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map2>
15: Call FnMapLookupElem
16: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
17: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -12
18: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map2>
20: Call FnMapLookupElem
21: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 1
22: Call -1 <global_fn>
23: AddImm dst: r0 imm: 1
24: Exit
global_fn2:
25: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
26: Exit
global_fn:
27: MovReg dst: r6 src: r1
28: Call 10
29: MovReg dst: r7 src: r0
30: MovReg dst: r1 src: r6
31: Call -7
32: MovReg dst: r8 src: r0
33: AddReg dst: r8 src: r7
34: MovReg dst: r1 src: r6
35: Call -1 <global_fn3>
36: AddReg dst: r8 src: r0
37: MovReg dst: r0 src: r8
38: Exit
static_fn:
39: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
40: Exit
global_fn3:
41: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
42: AddImm dst: r0 imm: 1
43: Exit
elf_reader_test.go:94: program xdp_prog: can't load program: errno 524: 0: (b7) r1 = 0
1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1
2: (b7) r1 = 1
3: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r1
4: (b7) r1 = 2
5: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -12) = r1
6: (bf) r2 = r10
7: (07) r2 += -4
8: (18) r1 = 0x1f84fe800
10: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
11: (bf) r2 = r10
12: (07) r2 += -8
13: (18) r1 = 0x1f84f9000
15: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
16: (bf) r2 = r10
17: (07) r2 += -12
18: (18) r1 = 0x1f84f9000
20: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
21: (b7) r1 = 1
22: (85) call pc+4
caller:
R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm fp-16=mmmm????
callee:
frame1: R1_w=invP1 R10=fp0
27: (bf) r6 = r1
28: (85) call pc+10
caller:
frame1: R6_w=invP1 R10=fp0
callee:
frame2: R1_w=invP1 R10=fp0
39: (bf) r0 = r1
40: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame2: R0_w=invP1 R1=invP1 R10=fp0
to caller at 29:
frame1: R0_w=invP1 R6=invP1 R10=fp0
from 40 to 29: frame1: R0_w=invP1 R6=invP1 R10=fp0
29: (bf) r7 = r0
30: (bf) r1 = r6
31: (85) call pc-7
caller:
frame1: R6=invP1 R7_w=invP1 R10=fp0
callee:
frame2: R1_w=invP1 R10=fp0
25: (bf) r0 = r1
26: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame2: R0_w=invP1 R1_w=invP1 R10=fp0
to caller at 32:
frame1: R0_w=invP1 R6=invP1 R7_w=invP1 R10=fp0
from 26 to 32: frame1: R0_w=invP1 R6=invP1 R7_w=invP1 R10=fp0
32: (bf) r8 = r0
33: (0f) r8 += r7
34: (bf) r1 = r6
35: (85) call pc+5
caller:
frame1: R6=invP1 R7=invP1 R8=invP2 R10=fp0
callee:
frame2: R1=invP1 R10=fp0
41: (bf) r0 = r1
42: (07) r0 += 1
43: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame2: R0_w=invP2 R1=invP1 R10=fp0
to caller at 36:
frame1: R0_w=invP2 R6=invP1 R7=invP1 R8=invP2 R10=fp0
from 43 to 36: frame1: R0_w=invP2 R6=invP1 R7=invP1 R8=invP2 R10=fp0
36: (0f) r8 += r0
37: (bf) r0 = r8
38: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame1: R0_w=invP4 R6=invP1 R7=invP1 R8_w=invP4 R10=fp0
to caller at 23:
R0_w=invP4 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm fp-16=mmmm????
from 38 to 23: R0_w=invP4 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm fp-16=mmmm????
23: (07) r0 += 1
24: (95) exit
JIT doesn't support bpf-to-bpf calls
processed 41 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 3 peak_states 3 mark_read 1
--- FAIL: TestLoadCollectionSpec/loader-clang-8.elf (0.00s)
elf_reader_test.go:85: xdp_prog:
0: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 0
1: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -4 imm: 0
2: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 1
3: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -8 imm: 0
4: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 2
5: StXMemW dst: rfp src: r1 off: -12 imm: 0
6: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
7: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -4
8: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map>
10: Call FnMapLookupElem
11: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
12: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -8
13: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map2>
15: Call FnMapLookupElem
16: MovReg dst: r2 src: rfp
17: AddImm dst: r2 imm: -12
18: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map2>
20: Call FnMapLookupElem
21: MovImm dst: r1 imm: 1
22: Call -1 <global_fn>
23: AddImm dst: r0 imm: 1
24: Exit
global_fn2:
25: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
26: Exit
global_fn:
27: MovReg dst: r6 src: r1
28: Call 10
29: MovReg dst: r7 src: r0
30: MovReg dst: r1 src: r6
31: Call -7
32: MovReg dst: r8 src: r0
33: AddReg dst: r8 src: r7
34: MovReg dst: r1 src: r6
35: Call -1 <global_fn3>
36: AddReg dst: r8 src: r0
37: MovReg dst: r0 src: r8
38: Exit
static_fn:
39: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
40: Exit
global_fn3:
41: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
42: AddImm dst: r0 imm: 1
43: Exit
elf_reader_test.go:94: invalid argument: magic: 0xeb9f
version: 1
flags: 0x0
hdr_len: 24
type_off: 0
type_len: 424
str_off: 424
str_len: 887
btf_total_size: 1335
[1] TYPEDEF uint32_t type_id=2
[2] INT unsigned int Invalid int_data:20000000
--- FAIL: TestLoadCollectionSpec/loader-clang-9.elf (0.00s)
elf_reader_test.go:85: xdp_prog:
0: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map>
2: LoadMapValue dst: r2, fd: -1 off: 0 <.bss>
4: Call FnMapLookupElem
5: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map2>
7: LoadMapValue dst: r2, fd: -1 off: 0 <.data>
9: Call FnMapLookupElem
10: LoadMapPtr dst: r1 fd: -1 <hash_map2>
12: LoadMapValue dst: r2, fd: -1 off: 0 <.rodata>
14: Call FnMapLookupElem
15: LoadMapValue dst: r7, fd: -1 off: 4 <.rodata>
17: LdXMemW dst: r1 src: r7 off: 0 imm: 0
18: Call -1 <static_fn>
19: MovReg dst: r6 src: r0
20: LdXMemW dst: r1 src: r7 off: 0 imm: 0
21: Call -1 <global_fn>
22: AddReg dst: r0 src: r6
23: Exit
global_fn2:
24: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
25: Exit
global_fn:
26: MovReg dst: r6 src: r1
27: Call 10
28: MovReg dst: r7 src: r0
29: MovReg dst: r1 src: r6
30: Call -7
31: MovReg dst: r8 src: r0
32: AddReg dst: r8 src: r7
33: MovReg dst: r1 src: r6
34: Call -1 <global_fn3>
35: AddReg dst: r8 src: r0
36: MovReg dst: r0 src: r8
37: Exit
static_fn:
38: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
39: Exit
global_fn3:
40: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
41: AddImm dst: r0 imm: 1
42: Exit
elf_reader_test.go:94: invalid argument: magic: 0xeb9f
version: 1
flags: 0x0
hdr_len: 24
type_off: 0
type_len: 868
str_off: 868
str_len: 916
btf_total_size: 1808
[1] STRUCT (anon) size=40 vlen=5
type type_id=2 bits_offset=0
key type_id=6 bits_offset=64
value type_id=6 bits_offset=128
max_entries type_id=2 bits_offset=192
map_flags type_id=2 bits_offset=256
[2] PTR (anon) type_id=4
[3] INT int Invalid int_data:20000001
--- FAIL: TestLink (0.00s)
linker_test.go:43: 0: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
1: Call -1 <my_func>
2: Exit
my_func:
3: Call -1 <my_other_func>
4: Exit
my_other_func:
5: LdImmDW dst: r0 imm: 1337
7: Exit
linker_test.go:49: can't load program: errno 524: 0: (bf) r0 = r1
1: (85) call pc+1
caller:
R10=fp0
callee:
frame1: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
3: (85) call pc+1
caller:
frame1: R10=fp0
callee:
frame2: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
5: (18) r0 = 0x539
7: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame2: R0_w=invP1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
to caller at 4:
frame1: R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
from 7 to 4: frame1: R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
4: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame1: R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
to caller at 2:
R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
from 4 to 2: R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
2: (95) exit
JIT doesn't support bpf-to-bpf calls
processed 7 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
FAIL
exit status 1
FAIL github.com/cilium/ebpf 0.161s
from ebpf.
alicefr
commented on May 29, 2024
But I'm not sure if those tests should be skipped as we get ENOTSUPP
from ebpf.
alicefr
commented on May 29, 2024
I tried to recompile the testdata:
$ clang --version
clang version 9.0.1 (Fedora 9.0.1-2.fc31)
Target: s390x-ibm-linux
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
$ cd testdata/
$ make clean
$ make loader-clang-9.elf rewrite.elf invalid_map.elf
$ ls
common.h invalid_map.c invalid_map.elf loader.c loader-clang-9.elf Makefile rewrite.c rewrite.elfNow, I get:
go test
--- FAIL: TestLoadCollectionSpec (0.00s)
--- FAIL: TestLoadCollectionSpec/loader-clang-9.elf (0.00s)
elf_reader_test.go:23: Can't parse ELF: file testdata/loader-clang-9.elf: load programs: program global_fn2: can't unmarshal instructions: offset 80: can't relocate instruction: call: global_fn3: incorrect source register
--- FAIL: TestLink (0.00s)
linker_test.go:43: 0: MovReg dst: r0 src: r1
1: Call -1 <my_func>
2: Exit
my_func:
3: Call -1 <my_other_func>
4: Exit
my_other_func:
5: LdImmDW dst: r0 imm: 1337
7: Exit
linker_test.go:49: can't load program: errno 524: 0: (bf) r0 = r1
1: (85) call pc+1
caller:
R10=fp0
callee:
frame1: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
3: (85) call pc+1
caller:
frame1: R10=fp0
callee:
frame2: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
5: (18) r0 = 0x539
7: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame2: R0_w=invP1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
to caller at 4:
frame1: R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
from 7 to 4: frame1: R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
4: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame1: R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
to caller at 2:
R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
from 4 to 2: R0_w=invP1337 R10=fp0
2: (95) exit
JIT doesn't support bpf-to-bpf calls
processed 7 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
FAIL
exit status 1
FAIL github.com/cilium/ebpf 0.175s
from ebpf.
lmb
commented on May 29, 2024
Can you upload the compiled testdata somewhere? No idea how to get cross compiling to work for this.
Issues I can see:
- Decoding instructions from the ELF also needs to swap registers OR we need to reject ELF that are not in the native endian
- Something in BTF is also endian dependent
- The s390x JIT doesn't support function calls
We can't do much about the last point, except detect the issue and skip the test. Bummer, I think bpf-2-bpf calls are pretty important.
Is there a way to get access to a s390x VM with a recent kernel?
from ebpf.
alicefr
commented on May 29, 2024
@lmb I might request a VM for the community, but it takes some time. Plus I have to check which distro they support. I may try to get the latest ubuntu distro and upgrade the kernel to the most recent one. Second solution is to boot an emulated s390x Fedora 31 image using qemu. Could you please ping me in the libbepf-go slack channel, cannot find you?
I'm also searching for some bpf expert for s390x inside my team ;). I hope we can get some help!
from ebpf.
lmb
commented on May 29, 2024
If you want to work on this, I have the following questions / suggestions:
- How different are big and little endian eBPF? Is it just swapped registers? maybe the code gen is different? The library can do either of two things: load eBPF in any endianness, and then translate to host endianness at load time OR only load eBPF in host endian. The latter is definitely simpler, and might be the safe choice to start with (but would be harder to test without a VM.)
- The same goes for BTF (BPF Type Format)
- How can we skip the unsupported bpf-2-bpf test? It might be enough to amend https://github.com/cilium/ebpf/blob/master/internal/testutils/feature.go#L50 for EOPNOTSUP. Otherwise you might be able to write a new feature test: https://github.com/cilium/ebpf/blob/master/internal/feature.go#L38 The latter is might be a bit difficult, since feature tests currently don't take the host architecture into account.
For testing: as long as there is no big endian CI we might get away with adding some tests that compare some serialized eBPF from the asm package with known-good eBPF emitted by clang or something. You should also be able to amend the Makefile in testdata to compile the ebpf as big endian with -march=bpfeb.
from ebpf.
alicefr
commented on May 29, 2024
@lmb as @iii-i suggested, the bpf-2-bpf has been fixed from kernel 5.4 with the commit 1c8f9b91c456f5b47a377a0c8c5d4130fc39433a. I installed a newer kernel and it the link test was successful:
$ uname -r
5.7.0-rc1
$ go test -run TestLink
PASS
ok github.com/cilium/ebpf 0.002s
from ebpf.
alicefr
commented on May 29, 2024
@lmb about enabling the CI for s390x. There are a couple of issues to do that.
The main problem how to get a kernel image for s390x. You're now fetching the kernel from https://github.com/cilium/ci-kernels. It is of course possible to cross-compile the kernel each time. But it takes ages. If you want we should add support for kernel cross-compilation in that repo
I had to do a small fix in virtme here: amluto/virtme#58 .
I tried to run an emulated guest and that required qemu-system-s390x 3.1. The default qemu-syste-s390x 2.7 didn't work for me.
If we need go inside the guest to run the test we need to generate correctly the rootfs for guest. Not sure if we might skip this by cross-compiling the test case for s390x and using s390x busybox binary .
This approach might be useful to test other arches but of course it requires some work and maintenance.
from ebpf.
lmb
commented on May 29, 2024
Sorry for the late reply. Good point re the s390x rootfs, I hadn't thought of that. To be honest I'd rather avoid cross compilation as much as possible. Kernels are probably OK, but doing the same for user land sounds like too much pain. Basically, we need a native CI runner. From my POV it would be acceptable if it's another big-endian arch if s390x is hard to come by.
from ebpf.
Related Issues (20)
- ProgramInfo.Instructions fails on parsing BTF line info HOT 2
- example xdp: The IP address output by xdp demo is empty HOT 5
- internal: use runtime.Pinner instead of runtime.KeepAlive (Go 1.21) HOT 3
- asm: add support for ISA v4 HOT 6
- internal: replace Memoize with sync.OnceValues (Go 1.21) HOT 1
- kconfig: validate that PutInteger doesn't truncate data HOT 7
- btf: support CO-RE relocation of ISAv4 instructions HOT 2
- internal: doesn't compile with golang.org/x/sys v0.14.0 HOT 2
- btf: move wire type definitions into sys HOT 2
- migrate tests to github.com/go-quicktest/qt
- sysenc: dealing with `[]struct{ ... }` forces allocations
- CI: store merged coverage as an artifact HOT 6
- CI: automatically build kernels
- After loading the ebpf program, the memory occupies 100MB and has not been released HOT 7
- map: move semantics for under sized per-CPU slices out of common per CPU marshaling code HOT 1
- map: revisit batch per-CPU API HOT 1
- When creating a large perf map, a null pointer error is encountered
- clang version >=12 will automatically add the -target bpfeb HOT 2
- Add BatchLookup support for a pointer to a slice HOT 8
- Missing support for iterating over per-CPU maps HOT 2
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from ebpf.