font about responsive-html-email-template HOT 3 CLOSED

thanks rafael! do you have a suggestion on which of the three methods to use? and given that, would you mind teaching me where in the template to add the code? *Miguel Zabludovsky* Slate NYC | CEO PERMISSION TO GET DIRTY The fully-integrated, daily home + clothes cleaning service used by over 5,000 people in New York. Get *your first week free* by clicking here <http://slatenyc.com/>. [image: /admin/uploads/img/412/google.jpg] <http://app.sigbuzz.me/l/L31/Wrp/> 473 Porter Avenue Brooklyn NY 11222 *W* slatenyc.com <http://app.sigbuzz.me/l/0jb/Wrp/> | *E * [email protected] <[email protected]> |* T* (800) 573-8459 <%2B1%208005738459> | *M* (917) 287-4978 <%2B1%209172874978> Connect with us: <http://facebook.com/slatenyc> <http://app.sigbuzz.me/l/Pjb/Wrp/> <http://youtube.com/slatenyc> <http://delicious.com/slatenyc> <http://app.sigbuzz.me/l/Djb/Wrp/> <http://www.yelp.com/biz/slate-nyc-new-york-2> Email disclaimers are assumed to be a wise precaution. But they are mostly, legally speaking, pointless. Lawyers and experts on internet policy say no court case has ever turned on the presence or absence of such an automatic e-mail footer in America, the most litigious of rich countries. Many disclaimers are, in effect, seeking to impose a contractual obligation unilaterally, and thus are probably unenforceable. This is clear in Europe, where a directive from the European Commission tells the courts to strike out any unreasonable contractual obligation on a consumer if he has not freely negotiated it. And a footer stating that nothing in the e-mail should be used to break the law would be of no protection to a lawyer or financial adviser sending a message that did suggest something illegal.